From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:29:13 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: allow build to succeed with SPL disabled
In-Reply-To: <1383211298-31071-1-git-send-email-vidyas@nvidia.com>
References: <1383211298-31071-1-git-send-email-vidyas@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <52728559.2010409@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 10/31/2013 03:21 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin and u-boot-nodtb-tegra.bin binaries
> are generated only if the SPL build is enabled as they have
> dependency on SPL build

Should they though? If there's no SPL, surely we still want to generate
the same output filenames, so that consumers of the binaries don't have
to care whether a particular board needs the SPL tacked onto the binary.

In other words, rather than:

u-boot-nodtb-tegra.bin == SPL + U-Boot
u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin == SPL + U-Boot + DTB

... when SPL is disabled, shouldn't we generate:

u-boot-nodtb-tegra.bin == U-Boot
u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin == U-Boot + DTB

That would require modifying the rules that generate those files not to
include the SPL binary in the concatenation, rather than simply not
generating those files at all.