[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: bcm2835: add missing mbox overscan response field

[Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>]

On 11/07/2013 06:29 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Andre,
> 
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:46:31 +0200, Andre Heider <a.heider@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 05:54:13PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/22/2013 09:27 PM, Andre Heider wrote:
>>>> Add the missing "right" field to struct bcm2835_mbox_tag_overscan.
>>>
>>> This one patch,
>>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
>>>
>>> You need to send/cc this patch to Albert Aribauld, since he applies ARM
>>> patches. Or, perhaps just make sure the patch gets assigned to him in
>>> patchwork?
>>
>> Okay, I did the patchwork dance :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andre
> 
> In fact, the series could be applied as a whole by the same custodian
> -- and actually, I'd prefer it to be applied as a whole, since patch 1/2
> alone looks like dead/useless code, whereas it makes sense if applied
> along with 2/2.

So, there are 2 patches and 2 custodians. One of you has to ack the
patch for the other to merge them both through the other's subsystem,
right? I guess you want Anatolij to take both of these through the video
tree based on your comments. If so, can you ack this patch and re-assign
them both in patchwork, so he knows that?