From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Nelson Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 15:57:02 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC] imx: add multi-architecture README In-Reply-To: <20131109211409.A1CC23811CC@gemini.denx.de> References: <1384027962-11556-1-git-send-email-eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com> <20131109211409.A1CC23811CC@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <527EBDBE.1000006@boundarydevices.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Thanks Wolfgang. On 11/09/2013 02:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Eric Nelson, > > In message <1384027962-11556-1-git-send-email-eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com> you wrote: > ... >> +Supporting multiple architectures on Freescale i.MX6 >> + >> +This file describes how to support multiple CPU architectures >> +(i.MX6DQ and i.MX6DLS) in a single U-Boot image. > > I think the term "architectures" is greatly misleading here. An > "architecture" is for example ARm or MIPS or Power Architecture. > > What you are talking about are mere CPU models. > > Please adapt the Subject and commit message. > Done. I started typing in "multi-CPU", but that's also overloaded, so I stumbled on BOMs, since that seems more to the point (that a board can be assembled using different specific parts). It still suffers from some awkwardness surrounding what to call the division between the high-end parts and the low-end. Choosing words is hard, and suggestions are welcome. I starting to use the term "SKU", but I'm not sure how commonly used that term has become. Regards, Eric