[U-Boot] [RFC] arm926ejs, at91: add common phy_reset function

[Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>]

Hi Heiko,

On 11/12/2013 09:50 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
>
> Am 12.11.2013 13:56, schrieb Andreas Bie?mann:
>> Hello Heiko,
>>
>> On 11/12/2013 11:21 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> add common phy reset code into a common function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher<hs@denx.de>
>>> Cc: Andreas Bie?mann<andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
>>> Cc: Bo Shen<voice.shen@atmel.com>
>>> Cc: Jens Scharsig<esw@bus-elektronik.de>
>>> Cc: Sergey Lapin<slapin@ossfans.org>
>>> Cc: Stelian Pop<stelian@popies.net>
>>> Cc: Albin Tonnerre<albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com>
>>> Cc: Eric Benard<eric@eukrea.com>
>>> Cc: Markus Hubig<mhubig@imko.de>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Patch based on the spl patchset from Bo Shen (as I want to
>>> collect this function in at91-common directory), see:
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-November/166272.html
>>> (reworked this against newest Kconfig Makefile changes ...
>>>   @Bo: Do you plan an update for this patchset for the Kconfig changes?
>>
>> @Bo: I'll review the patches also these days.

After Andreas finish reviewing the code, I will update this patchset for 
the Kconfig changes if needed.

> Perfect!
>
>>> Maybe my change in arch/arm/cpu/at91-common/Makefile
>>> could be done better... Do we have a common define for
>>> all this variants?
>>
>> I think not, but how about defining a new one?
>
> I am fine with this too...
>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/cpu/Makefile                           |  1 +
>>>   arch/arm/cpu/at91-common/Makefile               |  5 +++
>>>   arch/arm/cpu/at91-common/phy.c                  | 48
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_common.h    |  1 +
>>>   board/BuS/vl_ma2sc/vl_ma2sc.c                   | 18 ++--------
>>>   board/afeb9260/afeb9260.c                       | 18 +---------
>>>   board/atmel/at91sam9260ek/at91sam9260ek.c       | 19 +---------
>>>   board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/at91sam9263ek.c       | 19 ++--------
>>>   board/atmel/at91sam9m10g45ek/at91sam9m10g45ek.c | 19 +---------
>>>   board/bluewater/snapper9260/snapper9260.c       | 16 +--------
>>>   board/calao/sbc35_a9g20/sbc35_a9g20.c           | 19 +---------
>>>   board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c                  | 18 +---------
>>>   board/taskit/stamp9g20/stamp9g20.c              | 31 +---------------
>>>   spl/Makefile                                    |  4 ---
>>>   14 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
>>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/at91-common/phy.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/Makefile
>>> index fd0da53..886347d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/Makefile
>>> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA) += $(SOC)-common/
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA) += tegra-common/
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_AT91FAMILY) += at91-common/

<snip>

>>> diff --git a/spl/Makefile b/spl/Makefile
>>> index 736c6ca..cbd3d27 100644
>>> --- a/spl/Makefile
>>> +++ b/spl/Makefile
>>> @@ -111,10 +111,6 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_MX23)$(CONFIG_MX35),)
>>>   LIBS-y += arch/$(ARCH)/imx-common/libimx-common.o
>>>   endif
>>>
>>> -ifeq ($(SOC),at91)
>>> -LIBS-y += arch/$(ARCH)/cpu/at91-common/libat91-common.o
>>> -endif
>>> -
>>
>> That should not be removed here.
>
> See my change in arch/arm/cpu/Makefile
>
> With this change, this in the spl/Makefile is not needed ...
> I did this, because arch/arm/cpu/at91-common/ contains not only
> spl code. But maybe this should be changed in the spl patchset
> from bo?

I am not fully got your means. what should I change?

>> Looks good to me. Hopefully some board maintainers send their
>> tested-by ...
>
> I am too...
>
> bye,
> Heiko

Best Regards,
Bo Shen