[U-Boot] [ANN] v2014.01-rc1

[U-Boot] [ANN] v2014.01-rc1

[Tom Rini]

Hey all,

I've put v2014.01-rc1 out and and we should have a tarball out soon.

Lots of changes here, but the biggest one is a change to Kbuild style
Makefile rules, which means:
obj-$(CONFIG_FOO) += bar.o
rather than:
COBJS-$(CONFIG_FOO) += bar.o
or even:
COBJS += bar.o

And much simpiler Makefiles.  A big thanks to Masahiro Yamada for that!

As always, please speak up if something suddenly broke or you've found a
problem of some sort.  Thanks all!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20131125/b24dbb9a/attachment.pgp>

[U-Boot] [ANN] v2014.01-rc1

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Tom,

In message <20131125215854.GW420@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> 
> I've put v2014.01-rc1 out and and we should have a tarball out soon.

The tarball is on the FTP server.


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Die ganzen Zahlen hat der liebe Gott  geschaffen,  alles  andere  ist
Menschenwerk...                                     Leopold Kronecker

[U-Boot] [ANN] v2014.01-rc1

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hello.

> As always, please speak up if something suddenly broke or you've found a
> problem of some sort.  Thanks all!

I noticed at least two boards got broken by v2014.01-rc release:
cam_enc_4xx and linkstation_HGLAN


I bisected and

68ec9c85a9d334c7598b4972af037de05c034f8d is the first bad commit
for "cam_enc_4xx" board.


commit 68ec9c85a9d334c7598b4972af037de05c034f8d
Author: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
Date:   Fri Oct 4 13:47:58 2013 +0530

    mtd: move & update nand_ecclayout structure (plus board changes)



22ece0e2e23c5cc5a23a5b8aff3dc75c9832e82f is the first bad commit
for "linkstation_HGLAN" board.


commit 22ece0e2e23c5cc5a23a5b8aff3dc75c9832e82f
Author: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri Sep 20 16:03:42 2013 +0200

    net: rtl8169: Improve cache maintenance



Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

[U-Boot] [ANN] v2014.01-rc1

[Tom Rini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/27/2013 02:03 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hello.
> 
>> As always, please speak up if something suddenly broke or you've found a
>> problem of some sort.  Thanks all!
> 
> I noticed at least two boards got broken by v2014.01-rc release:
> cam_enc_4xx and linkstation_HGLAN
> 
> 
> I bisected and
> 
> 68ec9c85a9d334c7598b4972af037de05c034f8d is the first bad commit
> for "cam_enc_4xx" board.
> 
> 
> commit 68ec9c85a9d334c7598b4972af037de05c034f8d
> Author: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
> Date:   Fri Oct 4 13:47:58 2013 +0530
> 
>     mtd: move & update nand_ecclayout structure (plus board changes)\

This is toolchain specific.  I've got an email out to Heiko about what
the new settings should be so that the binary can be reduced in size
again.  I've also got an email to Scott asking if some of the changes he
did there for other boards are intentional or thinkos.

> 22ece0e2e23c5cc5a23a5b8aff3dc75c9832e82f is the first bad commit
> for "linkstation_HGLAN" board.
> 
> 
> commit 22ece0e2e23c5cc5a23a5b8aff3dc75c9832e82f
> Author: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> Date:   Fri Sep 20 16:03:42 2013 +0200
> 
>     net: rtl8169: Improve cache maintenance

I've emailed the board maintainer as the problem is that mpc824x lacks
cache support and is an EOL'd family from Freescale.  We'll either drop
the board or someone will have to add the

- -- 
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=/Mzi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[U-Boot] [ANN] v2014.01-rc1

[Yan, Miao]

Hi Tom,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de]
> On Behalf Of Tom Rini
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:59 AM
> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: [U-Boot] [ANN] v2014.01-rc1
> 
> Hey all,
> 
> I've put v2014.01-rc1 out and and we should have a tarball out soon.

Could you pick my patches here(device tree support for vxworks):

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275442/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275441/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275444/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275443/

And I see they are marked as "Superseded" in patchwork, what does that mean ? Thank you.

Miao

[U-Boot] [ANN] v2014.01-rc1

[Tom Rini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/27/2013 04:33 AM, Yan, Miao wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de]
>> On Behalf Of Tom Rini
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:59 AM
>> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> Subject: [U-Boot] [ANN] v2014.01-rc1
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I've put v2014.01-rc1 out and and we should have a tarball out soon.
> 
> Could you pick my patches here(device tree support for vxworks):
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275442/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275441/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275444/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275443/
> 
> And I see they are marked as "Superseded" in patchwork, what does that mean ? Thank you.

You said you would be doing a v2 to make them apply cleanly again so I
marked the old ones as Superseded under that expectation.

- -- 
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=918p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[U-Boot] [ANN] v2014.01-rc1

[Yan, Miao]

Hi Tom,

> You said you would be doing a v2 to make them apply cleanly again so I
> marked the old ones as Superseded under that expectation.
> 

I did re-tested patches and they can be applied cleanly at that time.  I should've said
that more clearly. 

Anyway, I did a rebase on 2014.01-rc1 and sent out emails. Please apply. Thank you very much.

Miao