From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Simek Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:33:47 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 0/13] Driver model implementation, tests, demo and GPIO In-Reply-To: References: <1385681264-31207-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org> <20131129100046.C00C.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> <529CD95D.8000901@samsung.com> <20131203213405.GK420@bill-the-cat> <20131203215410.GL420@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <529F050B.50408@monstr.eu> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 12/03/2013 11:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 3 December 2013 14:54, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:47:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> On 3 December 2013 14:34, Tom Rini wrote: >>>> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:24:40PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >>>>> Hi Tom, >>>>> >>>>> On 2 December 2013 13:27, Simon Glass wrote: >>>>>> +Tom >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2 December 2013 12:02, Mateusz Zalega wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/29/13 02:00, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >>>>>>>> How come 13/13 is missing? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's not. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it was missing until someone approved it, since it was over >>>>>> the 100KB limit. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think of this series? Do you think it is ready to apply? >>>> >>>> I think we're where it needs wider testing now, yes. But given that >>>> we've stumbled onto another problem or two with the bootm refactoring >>>> series, I'm really hesitant to pull something else big in for this >>>> release. Kbuild style Makefiles this time, start DM for v2014.04 is my >>>> plan currently. >>> >>> Sounds reasonable. It's ready to go, hopefully won't need a lot of >>> care and feeding before then. >>> >>> Re bootm I am still not thrilled with the outcome. We flushed out >>> quite a few cases in dark corners at great expense, but don't have a >>> lot of automated tests (only the vboot test actually runs bootm I >>> think). Any ideas on what we should do here? >> >> Well, did you see where Michal's test case was? It looks like that >> should fail anywhere, not just microblaze. For now, I really just want >> to get this latest bug fixed. > > OK I see it, will take a look. Thanks Simon. I wanted to look at it but I am too busy with others things which have higher priority. Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 263 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: