From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: bcm2835: config.mk isn't needed
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:41:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E95954.10306@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52E94ABF.8090906@wwwdotorg.org>
Am 29.01.2014 19:38, schrieb Stephen Warren:
> On 01/29/2014 02:22 AM, Andreas F?rber wrote:
>> Am 29.01.2014 06:42, schrieb Stephen Warren:
>>> The entries in config.mk were needed so that U-Boot could be built
>>> with an old version of the Raspberry Pi Foundation's toolchain. Without
>>> them, the build would error out with:
>>>
>>> ...-ld: error: .../libgcc.a(_bswapsi2.o) uses VFP register arguments,
>>> u-boot does not
>>>
>>> However, none of the 3 toolchains in the latest version of their
>>> tools.git, nor the Ubuntu/Linaro ARM compilers in at least Ubuntu Quantal
>>> or Saucy, need these options set in order to compile a working U-Boot.
>>> Hence, remove the options for simplicity.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/bcm2835/config.mk | 19 -------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
>>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/bcm2835/config.mk
>>
>> No objection against the patch, but why was arch/arm/config.mk using
>> -msoft-float in the first place?
>
> It wasn't. It was filtering -msoft-float out of the compiler flags,
> which then left the ABI up to the toolchain default, which was hardfp
> for one of the Raspberry Pi Foundation's toolchains - the same one that
> caused the error messages quoted above unless -msoft-float was removed
> from the compiler options.
You seem to have misread my question, it was not about bcm2835/config.mk
but about arm/config.mk, which bcm2835 was filtering.
I didn't quite get Tom's response about U-Boot being soft-float. It is
what I compile it to be, no? If I compile it with an hardfp toolchain
such as openSUSE's, without -msoft-float it is going to be hardfp IIUC.
softfp is for compatibility with non-VFP hardware I thought, but U-Boot
is clearly built with a per-board config, so it's not portable anyway.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 16746 AG N?rnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-29 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-29 5:42 [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: bcm2835: config.mk isn't needed Stephen Warren
2014-01-29 9:22 ` Andreas Färber
2014-01-29 17:32 ` Tom Rini
2014-01-29 18:38 ` Stephen Warren
2014-01-29 19:41 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2014-01-29 19:47 ` Tom Rini
2014-01-30 7:03 ` Andreas Färber
2014-02-05 2:19 ` Stephen Warren
2014-02-13 14:07 ` Albert ARIBAUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E95954.10306@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox