public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helmut Raiger <helmut.raiger@hale.at>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Chain loading an u-boot from an u-boot
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:56:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FB454E.5090800@hale.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F9EF7A.5080805@denx.de>

Hi Stefano,
> Hi Helmut,
>
>
> I understand the first two points, but why do you store the kernel again
> with 1bit HW-ECC ? The second U-Boot is able to check with 4bit BCH and
> your NAND requires 4bit.

This is mainly due to performance requirements. Using 4bit BCH
increases overhead and makes DMA (currently not used in the
kernel driver) a lot slower. We thought we might slip through with
1bit HW-ECC, but we will test this (hopefully not in the field this time 
;-) )
> I agree with Andreas' analyses. It seems that the second u-boot
> overwrites your running U-Boot and only if they are identical you have
> no problem, that means that you are not changing the running code.
I double-checked now, the running u-boot is not overwritten.
When the 2nd u-boot relocates it overwrites the first one, but
that shouldn't be a problem. The first u-boot keeps working after
loading (but not running) the second one without issues.

Only the 'go' crashes the system. u-boot starts stand-alone
application fine, just as the kernel. I really can't see the point
why another u-boot should be any different?!

Helmut


--
Scanned by MailScanner.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-12  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-10 11:11 [U-Boot] Chain loading an u-boot from an u-boot Helmut Raiger
2014-02-10 12:14 ` Andreas Bießmann
2014-02-10 12:57   ` Helmut Raiger
2014-02-12 21:59     ` Scott Wood
2014-02-13  9:45       ` Helmut Raiger
2014-02-11  9:38 ` Stefano Babic
2014-02-12  9:56   ` Helmut Raiger [this message]
2014-02-12 10:41     ` Stefano Babic
2014-02-12 10:45     ` Andreas Bießmann
2014-02-13  9:03       ` Helmut Raiger
2014-03-31 11:29         ` Helmut Raiger
2014-04-03 23:13           ` Simon Glass
2014-04-04  9:25             ` Stefano Babic
2014-04-09 14:07               ` Helmut Raiger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52FB454E.5090800@hale.at \
    --to=helmut.raiger@hale.at \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox