From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaehoon Chung Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:38:44 +0900 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v8 1/2] S5P: Exynos: Add GPIO pin numbering and rename definitions In-Reply-To: <1397626357-6091-2-git-send-email-akshay.s@samsung.com> References: <1397626357-6091-1-git-send-email-akshay.s@samsung.com> <1397626357-6091-2-git-send-email-akshay.s@samsung.com> Message-ID: <534E6BC4.2000008@samsung.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi, Akshay. Did you test exynos4 board? I have tested your patch-set with the exynos4 board(TRATS2). It didn't work. Occurred DATA_ABORT. gpio_set_pull(EXYNOS4x12_GPIO_X15,...); Add the comment at below. On 04/16/2014 02:32 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote: > This patch includes following changes : > * Adds gpio pin numbering support for EXYNOS SOCs. > To have consistent 0..n-1 GPIO numbering the banks are divided > into different parts where ever they have holes in them. > > * Rename GPIO definitions from GPIO_... to S5P_GPIO_... > These changes were done to enable cmd_gpio for EXYNOS and > cmd_gpio has GPIO_INPUT same as s5p_gpio driver and hence > getting a error during compilation. > > * Adds support for name to gpio conversion in s5p_gpio to enable > gpio command EXYNOS SoCs. Function has been added to asm/gpio.h > to decode the input gpio name to gpio number. > Example: SMDK5420 # gpio set gpa00 > > Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala > Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde > Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat > --- > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c | 403 +++---- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h | 17 +- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/gpio.h | 1778 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/gpio.h | 941 +++++++++++++--- > board/samsung/arndale/arndale.c | 11 +- > board/samsung/goni/goni.c | 26 +- > board/samsung/smdk5250/exynos5-dt.c | 20 +- > board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250.c | 19 +- > board/samsung/smdk5420/smdk5420.c | 15 +- > board/samsung/smdkc100/smdkc100.c | 5 +- > board/samsung/smdkv310/smdkv310.c | 17 +- > board/samsung/trats/trats.c | 39 +- > board/samsung/trats2/trats2.c | 74 +- > board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c | 51 +- > drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c | 194 +++- > 15 files changed, 2779 insertions(+), 831 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c > index 9edb475..e26eb51 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c > @@ -13,30 +13,23 @@ [..snip..] > - > +#if 0 > /* functions */ > void s5p_gpio_cfg_pin(struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int cfg); > void s5p_gpio_direction_output(struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int en); > @@ -244,6 +29,7 @@ unsigned int s5p_gpio_get_value(struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank, int gpio); > void s5p_gpio_set_pull(struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int mode); > void s5p_gpio_set_drv(struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int mode); > void s5p_gpio_set_rate(struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int mode); > +#endif Why did you use the "#if 0 ~ #endif". If it didn't need to use, it can be removed, isn't? Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung