public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] FSL eSPI driver is a mess, hack attached.
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:09:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <534EF16D.3020708@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394790386-21410-1-git-send-email-Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>

Mingkai,

Please take a look at this patch and see if you can verify and polish it.

York


On 03/14/2014 02:46 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> The fsl_espi.c is wreck w.r.t large TX data.
> Below is what I had to hack to load a FPGA over SPI and
> what is the malloc hack good for? This does not work
> well for TXing several MB data.
> 
> The driver needs to be rewritten and I do not have the
> time so I post what I got in the hope it can help someone
> else or trigger a rewrite.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/spi/fsl_espi.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/fsl_espi.c b/drivers/spi/fsl_espi.c
> index 7c84582..2843a8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/fsl_espi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/fsl_espi.c
> @@ -28,8 +28,9 @@ struct fsl_spi_slave {
>  
>  #define ESPI_MAX_CS_NUM		4
>  
> -#define ESPI_EV_RNE		(1 << 9)
> -#define ESPI_EV_TNF		(1 << 8)
> +#define ESPI_EV_DON		(1 << (31 - 17))
> +#define ESPI_EV_RNE		(1 << (31 - 22))
> +#define ESPI_EV_TNF		(1 << (31 - 23))
>  
>  #define ESPI_MODE_EN		(1 << 31)	/* Enable interface */
>  #define ESPI_MODE_TXTHR(x)	((x) << 8)	/* Tx FIFO threshold */
> @@ -37,6 +38,8 @@ struct fsl_spi_slave {
>  
>  #define ESPI_COM_CS(x)		((x) << 30)
>  #define ESPI_COM_TRANLEN(x)	((x) << 0)
> +#define ESPI_COM_TO             (1 << (31 - 4))
> +
>  
>  #define ESPI_CSMODE_CI_INACTIVEHIGH	(1 << 31)
>  #define ESPI_CSMODE_CP_BEGIN_EDGCLK	(1 << 30)
> @@ -146,8 +149,9 @@ int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
>  			| ESPI_CSMODE_CI_INACTIVEHIGH);
>  
>  	/* Character bit order: msb first */
> -	out_be32(&espi->csmode[cs], in_be32(&espi->csmode[cs])
> -		| ESPI_CSMODE_REV_MSB_FIRST);
> +	if (!(mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST))
> +		out_be32(&espi->csmode[cs], in_be32(&espi->csmode[cs])
> +			 | ESPI_CSMODE_REV_MSB_FIRST);
>  
>  	/* Character length in bits, between 0x3~0xf, i.e. 4bits~16bits */
>  	out_be32(&espi->csmode[cs], in_be32(&espi->csmode[cs])
> @@ -172,7 +176,7 @@ int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen, const void *data_out,
>  	int len = 0;
>  	int num_blks, num_chunks, max_tran_len, tran_len;
>  	int num_bytes;
> -	unsigned char *ch;
> +	//unsigned char *ch;
>  	unsigned char *buffer = NULL;
>  	size_t buf_len;
>  	u8 *cmd_buf = fsl->cmd_buf;
> @@ -216,20 +220,21 @@ int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen, const void *data_out,
>  		cmd_len = 0;
>  		break;
>  	}
> -
> +	dout = data_out;
>  	debug("spi_xfer: slave %u:%u dout %08X(%p) din %08X(%p) len %u\n",
>  	      slave->bus, slave->cs, *(uint *) dout,
>  	      dout, *(uint *) din, din, len);
>  
>  	num_chunks = DIV_ROUND_UP(data_len, max_tran_len);
> +	dout = buffer;
>  	while (num_chunks--) {
>  		if (data_in)
>  			din = buffer + rx_offset;
> -		dout = buffer;
>  		tran_len = min(data_len , max_tran_len);
>  		num_blks = DIV_ROUND_UP(tran_len + cmd_len, 4);
>  		num_bytes = (tran_len + cmd_len) % 4;
>  		fsl->data_len = tran_len + cmd_len;
> +		data_len -= tran_len;
>  		spi_cs_activate(slave);
>  
>  		/* Clear all eSPI events */
> @@ -253,11 +258,12 @@ int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen, const void *data_out,
>  			}
>  
>  			/* Wait for eSPI transmit to get out */
> -			udelay(80);
> +			udelay(5);
>  
>  			event = in_be32(&espi->event);
>  			if (event & ESPI_EV_RNE) {
>  				tmpdin = in_be32(&espi->rx);
> +#if 0
>  				if (num_blks == 0 && num_bytes != 0) {
>  					ch = (unsigned char *)&tmpdin;
>  					while (num_bytes--)
> @@ -266,7 +272,7 @@ int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen, const void *data_out,
>  					*(u32 *) din = tmpdin;
>  					din += 4;
>  				}
> -
> +#endif
>  				out_be32(&espi->event, in_be32(&espi->event)
>  						| ESPI_EV_RNE);
>  				debug("***spi_xfer:...%08x readed\n", tmpdin);
> @@ -301,6 +307,7 @@ void spi_cs_activate(struct spi_slave *slave)
>  
>  	com &= ~(ESPI_COM_CS(0x3) | ESPI_COM_TRANLEN(0xFFFF));
>  	com |= ESPI_COM_CS(slave->cs);
> +	com |= ESPI_COM_TO;
>  	com |= ESPI_COM_TRANLEN(data_len - 1);
>  	out_be32(&espi->com, com);
>  }
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-16 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-14  9:46 [U-Boot] FSL eSPI driver is a mess, hack attached Joakim Tjernlund
2014-03-14 21:45 ` Michael Walle
2014-03-15 11:33   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2014-03-17 12:13     ` Michael Walle
2014-04-16 21:09 ` York Sun [this message]
2014-04-17  3:48   ` Mingkai.Hu at freescale.com
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-23 11:27 Eliot Dudley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=534EF16D.3020708@freescale.com \
    --to=yorksun@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox