* [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards
@ 2014-04-18 12:36 Tom Rini
2014-04-18 15:38 ` York Sun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2014-04-18 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hey guys,
Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion,
MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can
we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks!
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20140418/3c20fcc3/attachment.pgp>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards
2014-04-18 12:36 [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards Tom Rini
@ 2014-04-18 15:38 ` York Sun
2014-04-18 16:04 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: York Sun @ 2014-04-18 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 04/18/2014 05:36 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion,
> MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can
> we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks!
>
Tom,
Freescale board maintainers have been increasing the image size on some boards
to 768KB. How many are still broken if adding AES256 support?
York
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards
2014-04-18 15:38 ` York Sun
@ 2014-04-18 16:04 ` Tom Rini
2014-04-18 16:11 ` York Sun
2014-04-23 21:37 ` York Sun
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2014-04-18 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:38:32AM -0700, York Sun wrote:
> On 04/18/2014 05:36 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion,
> > MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can
> > we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks!
> >
>
> Tom,
>
> Freescale board maintainers have been increasing the image size on some boards
> to 768KB. How many are still broken if adding AES256 support?
Not many:
io neo iocon MPC8572DS MPC8572DS_36BIT dlvision-10g
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20140418/09c3793a/attachment.pgp>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards
2014-04-18 16:04 ` Tom Rini
@ 2014-04-18 16:11 ` York Sun
2014-04-23 21:37 ` York Sun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: York Sun @ 2014-04-18 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 04/18/2014 09:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:38:32AM -0700, York Sun wrote:
>> On 04/18/2014 05:36 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion,
>>> MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can
>>> we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> Tom,
>>
>> Freescale board maintainers have been increasing the image size on some boards
>> to 768KB. How many are still broken if adding AES256 support?
>
> Not many:
> io neo iocon MPC8572DS MPC8572DS_36BIT dlvision-10g
>
In this case, let me try to address the size. I can't test other than Freescale
boards. The change should be similar to commit
c6e8f49a16915822ffe25904daf1fc9c28115ed4 and/or
e222b1f36fedb0363dbc21e0add7dc3848bae553.
York
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards
2014-04-18 16:04 ` Tom Rini
2014-04-18 16:11 ` York Sun
@ 2014-04-23 21:37 ` York Sun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: York Sun @ 2014-04-23 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 04/18/2014 09:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:38:32AM -0700, York Sun wrote:
>> On 04/18/2014 05:36 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion,
>>> MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can
>>> we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> Tom,
>>
>> Freescale board maintainers have been increasing the image size on some boards
>> to 768KB. How many are still broken if adding AES256 support?
>
> Not many:
> io neo iocon MPC8572DS MPC8572DS_36BIT dlvision-10g
>
Tom,
I sent a patch to increase the size for these boards. Please review
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/342009/.
York
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-23 21:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-18 12:36 [U-Boot] FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards Tom Rini
2014-04-18 15:38 ` York Sun
2014-04-18 16:04 ` Tom Rini
2014-04-18 16:11 ` York Sun
2014-04-23 21:37 ` York Sun
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox