From: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 1/2] S5P: Exynos: Add GPIO pin numbering and rename definitions
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:50:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535E2480.6060801@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398439967-7621-1-git-send-email-akshay.s@samsung.com>
Hi again,
On 04/25/2014 05:32 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
> Hi Przemyslaw Marczak,
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04/21/2014 04:25 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
>>> This patch includes following changes :
>>> * Adds gpio pin numbering support for EXYNOS SOCs.
>>> To have consistent 0..n-1 GPIO numbering the banks are divided
>>> into different parts where ever they have holes in them.
>>>
>>> * Rename GPIO definitions from GPIO_... to S5P_GPIO_...
>>> These changes were done to enable cmd_gpio for EXYNOS and
>>> cmd_gpio has GPIO_INPUT same as s5p_gpio driver and hence
>>> getting a error during compilation.
>>>
>>> * Adds support for name to gpio conversion in s5p_gpio to enable
>>> gpio command EXYNOS SoCs. Function has been added to asm/gpio.h
>>> to decode the input gpio name to gpio number.
>>> Example: SMDK5420 # gpio set gpa00
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde <rajeshwari.s@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c | 403 +++----
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h | 17 +-
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/gpio.h | 1786 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/gpio.h | 941 +++++++++++++---
>>> board/samsung/arndale/arndale.c | 11 +-
>>> board/samsung/goni/goni.c | 26 +-
>>> board/samsung/smdk5250/exynos5-dt.c | 20 +-
>>> board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250.c | 19 +-
>>> board/samsung/smdk5420/smdk5420.c | 15 +-
>>> board/samsung/smdkc100/smdkc100.c | 5 +-
>>> board/samsung/smdkv310/smdkv310.c | 17 +-
>>> board/samsung/trats/trats.c | 39 +-
>>> board/samsung/trats2/trats2.c | 74 +-
>>> board/samsung/universal_c210/universal.c | 51 +-
>>> drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c | 195 +++-
>>> 15 files changed, 2778 insertions(+), 841 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c
>>> index 11a0472..a93928a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c
>>> @@ -8,11 +8,12 @@
>>> #include <common.h>
>>> #include <asm/io.h>
>>> #include <asm/gpio.h>
>>> +#include <asm/arch-exynos/gpio.h>
>> This is common driver, so it should be:
>>
>> #include <asm/arch/gpio.h>
>>
>
> Will fix it in the next patch-set.
>
>>> #define S5P_GPIO_GET_BANK(x) ((x >> S5P_GPIO_BANK_SHIFT) \
>>> & S5P_GPIO_BANK_MASK)
>>>
>>> -#define S5P_GPIO_GET_PIN(x) (x & S5P_GPIO_PIN_MASK)
>>> +#define S5P_GPIO_GET_PIN(x) ((x & S5P_GPIO_PIN_MASK) % GPIO_PER_BANK)
>>
>> And again...we don't need above macros, we can use now linear numbering.
>>
>
> Yes, you are right we don't need S5P_GPIO_GET_BANK but we are still using S5P_GPIO_GET_PIN.
> Will fix it.
>
>>
>>> +#ifdef HAVE_GENERIC_GPIO
>>> +struct s5p_gpio_bank *s5p_gpio_get_bank(unsigned int gpio)
>>> +{
>>> + const struct gpio_info *data;
>>> + unsigned int upto;
>>> + int i, count;
>>> +
>>> + data = get_gpio_data();
>>> + count = get_bank_num();
>>> + for (i = upto = 0; i < count;
>>> + i++, upto = data->max_gpio, data++) {
>>> + debug("i=%d, upto=%d\n", i, upto);
>>> + if (gpio < data->max_gpio) {
>>> + struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank;
>>> + bank = (struct s5p_gpio_bank *)data->reg_addr;
>>> + bank += (gpio - upto) / GPIO_PER_BANK;
>>> + debug("gpio=%d, bank=%p\n", gpio, bank);
>>> + return bank;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>
>> You are using exynos_gpio_get() in code but this function is not
>> compiled. Again please remove it.
>>
>
> Yes, #else part is not being used, I can get rid of this.
> But I can't see exynos_gpio_get() call here.
>
I mean calls in whole code.
>>> struct s5p_gpio_bank *s5p_gpio_get_bank(unsigned gpio)
>>> {
>>> unsigned bank = S5P_GPIO_GET_BANK(gpio);
>>> @@ -134,6 +252,7 @@ struct s5p_gpio_bank *s5p_gpio_get_bank(unsigned gpio)
>>>
>>> return (struct s5p_gpio_bank *)(base + bank);
>>> }
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --
>> Przemyslaw Marczak
>> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>> Samsung Electronics
>> p.marczak at samsung.com
>>
>
> Regards,
> Akshay Saraswat
>
I hope that everything is clear now.
Thanks
--
Przemyslaw Marczak
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
p.marczak at samsung.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-28 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-25 15:32 [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 1/2] S5P: Exynos: Add GPIO pin numbering and rename definitions Akshay Saraswat
2014-04-28 9:50 ` Przemyslaw Marczak [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-21 14:25 [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 0/2] S5P: Exynos: Add GPIO numbering feature Akshay Saraswat
2014-04-21 14:25 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 1/2] S5P: Exynos: Add GPIO pin numbering and rename definitions Akshay Saraswat
2014-04-25 13:44 ` Przemyslaw Marczak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535E2480.6060801@samsung.com \
--to=p.marczak@samsung.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox