public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] bootm: allow to disable legacy image format
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:36:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53707A16.20703@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140509191248.GV22182@bill-the-cat>

Hello Tom, Simon, Wolfgang, Lars,

Am 09.05.2014 21:12, schrieb Tom Rini:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:47:44PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> On 9 May 2014 07:35, Wolfgang Denk<wd@denx.de>  wrote:
>>> Dear Simon,
>>>
>>> In message<CAPnjgZ1_Cf-eu592YqF0=th7MT1da6Gh7Pv1Lxaf79kV8Lw9OQ@mail.gmail.com>  you wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I agree that it might be dangerous to allow legacy boot when signature
>>>> verification is used. It would be nice to fix that.
>>>
>>> I think there is general agreement on this point.
>>>
>>>> This means that legacy is on by default, unless signature verification
>>>> is enabled, in which case the default flips. But I worry that it might
>>>> only confuse people. This seems like a Wolfgang / Tom question :-)
>>>
>>> OK, here is my 0.02? to it:
>>>
>>> I think, no matter how we implement it, this should exactly the
>>> behaviour.  Average users tend to avoid reading documentation, so if
>>> they enable signature verification the most likely want a secure
>>> system, so we should give them just that.  Only if someone really
>>> knows what he is doing he should be able to enable support for
>>> (insecure) legacy images.
>>>
>>> As for the implementation - yes, the
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE_VERIFICATION
>>> approach indeed does not look very nice, but then, it appears to be
>>> the straightforward implementation of what we want to do?
>>
>> OK, well in that case, let's do it that way.
>
> Agreed, then we can look for clever ways to refactor the code after.

Ok, summary for one first step (I can do):

- introduce CONFIG_IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY based on patch [1]
   (rename "+#if !defined(CONFIG_DISABLE_IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY)"
    to "+#if defined(CONFIG_IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY)")

- set CONFIG_IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY as default:
   (little bit adapted towards simons CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE_VERIFICATION
    proposal ... I dont want to introduce a new define ...)

in config_defaults:
+#ifndef CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE
+#define CONFIG_IMAGE_LEGACY
+#endif

so, if boards not define CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE, they
have default CONFIG_IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY enabled (as currently).

If CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE is enabled, legacy image format is default
disabled (change current behaviour of boards, which use this
feature! This is only the case for:

$ grep -lr CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE include/
include/configs/zynq-common.h -> Michal, add Michal therefore to Cc
include/configs/sandbox.h -> Simon
include/configs/ids8313.h -> me
include/image.h
$

), but boards can enable it if needed (as ids8313 board needs
it ... yes not nice ...)

If boards which have not enabled CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE
and want to disable legacy image format ... we can add this
case if we want like:

in config_defaults:
+#ifndef CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE
+#define CONFIG_IMAGE_LEGACY
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DISABLE_IMAGE_LEGACY
+#undef CONFIG_IMAGE_LEGACY
+#endif

Is this a way to go?

bye,
Heiko

[1]:
[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] bootm: allow to disable legacy image format
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-May/179190.html
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-12  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-08 11:05 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] mpc8313: ids8313 board updates Heiko Schocher
2014-05-08 11:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] bootm: allow to disable legacy image format Heiko Schocher
2014-05-08 13:02   ` mike
2014-05-09  4:29     ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-05-09  5:12     ` Heiko Schocher
2014-05-09 13:13       ` Simon Glass
2014-05-09 13:35         ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-05-09 18:47           ` Simon Glass
2014-05-09 19:12             ` Tom Rini
2014-05-12  7:36               ` Heiko Schocher [this message]
2014-05-12 15:00                 ` Tom Rini
2014-05-08 11:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mpc8313, signed fit: disable legacy image format on ids8313 board Heiko Schocher
2014-05-08 20:19   ` Kim Phillips
2014-05-08 11:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] lib, fdt: move fdtdec_get_int() out of lib/fdtdec.c Heiko Schocher
2014-05-09 19:59   ` Simon Glass
2014-05-12  7:09     ` Heiko Schocher
2014-05-08 11:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mpc8313: add CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD to ids8313 board Heiko Schocher
2014-05-08 20:19   ` Kim Phillips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53707A16.20703@denx.de \
    --to=hs@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox