public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] Signed-off-by rules for U-Boot
@ 2014-05-13 18:03 Stephen Warren
  2014-05-13 18:14 ` Stefano Babic
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2014-05-13 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Does U-Boot follow the same Signed-off-by procedures as the Linux
kernel, or is s-o-b only relevant in U-Boot for the initial patch
submitter, and not maintainers?

I ask because there are a bunch of patches of mine that got applied
without the maintainer adding their S-o-b when applying them, which
would be very unusual for Linux, but perhaps it's normal for U-Boot?

Some likely non-exhaustive examples are:

2813006fecda usb: ci_udc: allow multiple buffer allocs per ep
66b88b07cdab usb: ums: add error handling for failed registration
264e0e591bbd config: enable CMD_BMP when API+LCD is enabled
53eb768dfb97 aes: make apply_cbc_chain_data non-static

Yet others did get a maintainer s-o-b:

d381294aef4a ARM: tegra: pack pinmux data tables tighter
def816a2ba87 mmc: set rca to 1 for MMC cards
91171091c673 ARM: tegra: make use of negative ENV_OFFSET on NVIDIA...
6ab6a650a418 disk: initialize name/part fields when returning a whole...
c75942c7b792 sf: winbond: fix page_size

It seems like it mostly varies by maintainer.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-13 18:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-13 18:03 [U-Boot] Signed-off-by rules for U-Boot Stephen Warren
2014-05-13 18:14 ` Stefano Babic

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox