From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: add wrappers for MMC block_{read, write, erase}
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:30:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538CA6AA.4040105@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A5467F08-FBD4-40D5-9B53-65D79740F7ED@antoniou-consulting.com>
On 06/02/2014 12:42 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I wanted the discussion to settle a bit before I reply to this series.
> On May 29, 2014, at 1:15 AM, Steve Rae wrote:
>
>> Each wrapper function:
>> - switches to the specified physical partition, then
>> - performs the original function, and then
>> - switches back to the original physical partition
>> where the physical partition (aka HW partition) is
>> 0=User, 1=Boot1, 2=Boot2, etc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Rae <srae@broadcom.com>
>> ---
>
> [snip]
>
>> /**
>> * Start device initialization and return immediately; it does not block on
>> * polling OCR (operation condition register) status. Then you should call
>> --
>> 1.8.5
>>
>
> The thing IMO should be modeled in the same way that block devices work in
> Linux.
>
> TBH I'm not very fond of the way block devices/partitions and the block_ops
> are intermixed in block_dev_t. This part of code could use some refactoring
> to make it operate more like a regular linux block device (with each partition
> being it's own block device), but I don't know if we have enough votes to change
> it ATM.
Refactoring that would make sense to me. That way, any client code could
just pass the user's command-line (or whatever) parameters to some
lookup function, which could return something that accesses whatever the
user wants, without the code that accesses the data caring whether it's
a complete block device, a complete HW partition, or a SW partition
within one of those. Of course, I guess that's already the case, it's
just that the information is split across block_dev_desc_t and
disk_partition_t, when it doesn't really need to be.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-02 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-28 22:15 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: add wrappers for MMC block_{read, write, erase} Steve Rae
2014-05-29 5:47 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-05-29 7:03 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-05-29 17:24 ` Steve Rae
2014-05-29 16:25 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-29 17:58 ` Steve Rae
2014-05-29 18:51 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-29 19:44 ` Steve Rae
2014-05-29 20:30 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-29 22:03 ` Steve Rae
2014-05-30 15:58 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-30 16:56 ` Steve Rae
2014-05-30 17:07 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-30 18:39 ` Steve Rae
2014-06-02 6:42 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2014-06-02 16:30 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538CA6AA.4040105@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox