From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [Patch v4 2/5] ARMv8: Adjust MMU setup
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 07:52:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5391D5BC.8030004@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+SgZxiGD3vsMQEMHNZAtFL-yf=XzX4nk4f=FYP4XyD0A@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/06/2014 06:34 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:34 PM, York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com> wrote:
>> On 06/05/2014 10:41 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:07:17PM +0100, York Sun wrote:
>>>> On 06/05/2014 03:09 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> No objection here on the idea. But again this is not the case. My first MMU
>>>> table is in SRAM, which is small and will be used for other purpose. The 2nd MMU
>>>> table is in DDR. I could copy the table and do the maintenance as you said. For
>>>> now, I want to stick with the static table and only create the API when I have to.
>>>
>>> Sure, if your tables are in SRAM then trying to do a load of dynamic
>>> allocation isn't going to work.
>
> Why do you need to turn on the MMU early using SRAM in the first
> place? Can't you delay that until after DDR setup?
Logically yes. But it runs too slow without cache on emulator.
>
>>> My fear is that while that sounds OK with a single user to do a quick
>>> havk and poke the tables directly, we'll end up with everyone doing
>>> that, and no-one will try to unify things. It is very diffifcult to
>>> unify such variation after the fact.
>>
>> That's a good reason. Let me start to code the API. It will take a while to
>> cover the complexity of the multilevel tables and sizes. It will be a separated
>> patch for later review. I don't want that to delay this patch set. I am hoping
>> to get this set in for 2014.07 release.
>
> If I was maintainer I would say no because few people come back later
> to clean-up their mess. If you want to get platform support in now,
> perhaps you should just add the base platform first and add mmu setup
> later. Surely you don't need the MMU to just boot to u-boot shell.
>
My plan is to get the first platform in, then I will maintain Freescale stuff.
So you can be sure I will continue to improve it. One reason to get these code
in early is to enable our partners and early adopters to use u-boot. After all,
this is the second ARMv8 platform. The first one vexpress_aemv8a doesn't even
support cache.
York
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-29 20:49 [U-Boot] [Patch v4 1/5] Added 64-bit MMIO accessors for ARMv8 York Sun
2014-05-29 20:49 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v4 2/5] ARMv8: Adjust MMU setup York Sun
2014-06-02 11:34 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-02 16:06 ` York Sun
2014-06-02 18:01 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-04 16:27 ` York Sun
2014-06-05 10:09 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-05 15:07 ` York Sun
2014-06-05 17:41 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-05 18:34 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 12:33 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-06 14:54 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 17:32 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-06 17:37 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 20:17 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 22:14 ` York Sun
2014-06-10 9:15 ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-10 16:04 ` York Sun
2014-06-13 19:41 ` York Sun
2014-06-18 14:09 ` fenghua at phytium.com.cn
2014-06-18 15:44 ` York Sun
2014-06-06 13:34 ` Rob Herring
2014-06-06 14:52 ` York Sun [this message]
2014-06-06 16:09 ` Tom Rini
2014-05-29 20:49 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v4 3/5] ARMv8/FSL_LSCH3: Add FSL_LSCH3 SoC York Sun
2014-06-11 14:05 ` fenghua at phytium.com.cn
2014-06-11 14:55 ` York Sun
2014-05-29 20:49 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v4 4/5] armv8/fsl-lsch3: Add support to load and start MC Firmware York Sun
2014-05-29 20:49 ` [U-Boot] [Patch v4 5/5] ARMv8/ls2100a_emu: Add LS2100A emulator and simulator board support York Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5391D5BC.8030004@freescale.com \
--to=yorksun@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox