From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:08:51 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 08/12] sunxi: Add axp209 pmic support In-Reply-To: References: <1401824522-11353-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1401824522-11353-9-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1401993642.15729.176.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> <53956F87.2000700@redhat.com> <1402303831.14895.3.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <53957767.6070402@redhat.com> Message-ID: <539579A3.6030409@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi, On 06/09/2014 11:06 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:59:19 +0200, Hans de Goede > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 06/09/2014 10:50 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 10:25 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> https://github.com/jwrdegoede/u-boot-sunxi/commits/sunxi-upstreaming >>>> >>>> Note I often rebase + force push this branch. >>> >>> I noticed ;-) >>> >>>> Note I won't be re-posting these until the i2c controller conversion to >>>> the CONFIG_SYS_I2C framework is sorted out. >>> >>> No problem. Is that a big rework then? >> >> Not all that big, I'm working on it now, I hope to have it finished by the >> end of today. >> >>> How would you feel about reordering things a bit to push the i2c/power >>> and sun[45]i stuff to the end, most of the rest looks more or less >>> trivial/uncontroversial to me and could potentially be applied sooner >>> rather than later (ulterior motive: this would unblock my AHCI >>> patches ;-)) >> >> I agree, actually if you look in where your u-boot list mails go you will >> see a pull-req to Albert there for the entire set I've been working on minus >> the i2c + axp patches :) > > Don't bother with the pull request, as I only apply PRs from git.denx.de > U-Boot repositories. I will happily apply your series from Patchwork. > Just make sure it is properly assigned to me. Ok, since I dropped some patches which need more work from the series, some of the latter ones needed some manual rebasing to apply. So I will send a new version of the set. How do I ensure that those patches end up being assigned to you ? So far I've been sending my patches with you as the "To" of the emails and the list in the Cc, is that sufficient ? Regards, Hans