[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] cmd_mmc: add force_init parameter to init_mmc_device()

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] cmd_mmc: add force_init parameter to init_mmc_device()

[Stephen Warren]

From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

This allows callers to inject mmc->has_init = 0 between finding the
MMC device, and calling mmc_init(), which forces mmc_init() to rescan
the HW. Future changes will use this feature.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
---

 common/cmd_mmc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/cmd_mmc.c b/common/cmd_mmc.c
index 9e6a26fe62a2..6741ebee3bca 100644
--- a/common/cmd_mmc.c
+++ b/common/cmd_mmc.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void print_mmcinfo(struct mmc *mmc)
 
 	printf("Bus Width: %d-bit\n", mmc->bus_width);
 }
-static struct mmc *init_mmc_device(int dev)
+static struct mmc *init_mmc_device(int dev, bool force_init)
 {
 	struct mmc *mmc;
 	mmc = find_mmc_device(dev);
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ static struct mmc *init_mmc_device(int dev)
 		printf("no mmc device at slot %x\n", dev);
 		return NULL;
 	}
+	if (force_init)
+		mmc->has_init = 0;
 	if (mmc_init(mmc))
 		return NULL;
 	return mmc;
@@ -117,7 +119,7 @@ static int do_mmcinfo(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
 		}
 	}
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
@@ -247,7 +249,7 @@ static int do_mmcrpmb(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 	if (flag == CMD_FLAG_REPEAT && !cp->repeatable)
 		return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
@@ -292,7 +294,7 @@ static int do_mmc_read(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 	blk = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
 	cnt = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 16);
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
@@ -320,7 +322,7 @@ static int do_mmc_write(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 	blk = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
 	cnt = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 16);
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
@@ -348,7 +350,7 @@ static int do_mmc_erase(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 	blk = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 16);
 	cnt = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
@@ -387,7 +389,7 @@ static int do_mmc_part(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 	block_dev_desc_t *mmc_dev;
 	struct mmc *mmc;
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
@@ -422,7 +424,7 @@ static int do_mmc_dev(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 		return CMD_RET_USAGE;
 	}
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
@@ -462,7 +464,7 @@ static int do_mmc_bootbus(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 	reset = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 10);
 	mode = simple_strtoul(argv[4], NULL, 10);
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
@@ -487,7 +489,7 @@ static int do_mmc_boot_resize(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 	bootsize = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 10);
 	rpmbsize = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 10);
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
@@ -520,7 +522,7 @@ static int do_mmc_partconf(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 	part_num = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 10);
 	access = simple_strtoul(argv[4], NULL, 10);
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
@@ -555,7 +557,7 @@ static int do_mmc_rst_func(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 		return CMD_RET_USAGE;
 	}
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
-- 
1.8.1.5

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] cmd_mmc: Use init_mmc_device() from do_mmc_rescan()

[Stephen Warren]

From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

The body of init_mmc_device() is now identical to that of do_mmc_rescan()
except for the error codes returned. Modify do_mmc_rescan() to simply
call init_mmc_device() and convert the error codes, to avoid code
duplication.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
---
 common/cmd_mmc.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/cmd_mmc.c b/common/cmd_mmc.c
index 6741ebee3bca..6c8db2e78c4f 100644
--- a/common/cmd_mmc.c
+++ b/common/cmd_mmc.c
@@ -371,16 +371,10 @@ static int do_mmc_rescan(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 {
 	struct mmc *mmc;
 
-	mmc = find_mmc_device(curr_device);
-	if (!mmc) {
-		printf("no mmc device at slot %x\n", curr_device);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, true);
+	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
-	}
-
-	mmc->has_init = 0;
 
-	if (mmc_init(mmc))
-		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 	return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
 }
 static int do_mmc_part(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
-- 
1.8.1.5

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] cmd_mmc: Use init_mmc_device() from do_mmc_rescan()

[Pantelis Antoniou]

Hi Stephen,

On May 23, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> 
> The body of init_mmc_device() is now identical to that of do_mmc_rescan()
> except for the error codes returned. Modify do_mmc_rescan() to simply
> call init_mmc_device() and convert the error codes, to avoid code
> duplication.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
> common/cmd_mmc.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/cmd_mmc.c b/common/cmd_mmc.c
> index 6741ebee3bca..6c8db2e78c4f 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_mmc.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_mmc.c
> @@ -371,16 +371,10 @@ static int do_mmc_rescan(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> {
> 	struct mmc *mmc;
> 
> -	mmc = find_mmc_device(curr_device);
> -	if (!mmc) {
> -		printf("no mmc device at slot %x\n", curr_device);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, true);
> +	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> -	}
> -
> -	mmc->has_init = 0;
> 
> -	if (mmc_init(mmc))
> -		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 	return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
> }
> static int do_mmc_part(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> -- 
> 1.8.1.5
> 

Looks good.

Thanks, applied.

-- Pantelis

Acked-by: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] cmd_mmc: make mmc dev always re-probe the HW

[Stephen Warren]

From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

Currently, U-Boot behaves as follows:

- Begin with no SD card inserted in "mmc 1"
- Execute: mmc dev 1
- This fails, since there is no card
- User plugs in an SD card
- Execute: mmc dev 1
- This still fails, since the HW isn't reprobed.

With this change, U-Boot behaves as follows:

- Begin with no SD card inserted in "mmc 1"
- Execute: mmc dev 1
- This fails, since there is no card
- User plugs in an SD card
- Execute: mmc dev 1
- The newly present SD card is detected

I know that "mmc rescan" will force the HW to be reprobed, but I feel it
makes more sense if "mmc dev" always reprobes the HW after selecting the
current MMC device. This allows scripts to just execute "mmc dev", and
not have to also execute "mmc rescan" to check for media presense.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
---
 common/cmd_mmc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/common/cmd_mmc.c b/common/cmd_mmc.c
index 6c8db2e78c4f..1e40983c757b 100644
--- a/common/cmd_mmc.c
+++ b/common/cmd_mmc.c
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static int do_mmc_dev(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
 		return CMD_RET_USAGE;
 	}
 
-	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
+	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, true);
 	if (!mmc)
 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
 
-- 
1.8.1.5

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] cmd_mmc: make mmc dev always re-probe the HW

[Pantelis Antoniou]

Hi Stephen,

On May 23, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> 
> Currently, U-Boot behaves as follows:
> 
> - Begin with no SD card inserted in "mmc 1"
> - Execute: mmc dev 1
> - This fails, since there is no card
> - User plugs in an SD card
> - Execute: mmc dev 1
> - This still fails, since the HW isn't reprobed.
> 
> With this change, U-Boot behaves as follows:
> 
> - Begin with no SD card inserted in "mmc 1"
> - Execute: mmc dev 1
> - This fails, since there is no card
> - User plugs in an SD card
> - Execute: mmc dev 1
> - The newly present SD card is detected
> 
> I know that "mmc rescan" will force the HW to be reprobed, but I feel it
> makes more sense if "mmc dev" always reprobes the HW after selecting the
> current MMC device. This allows scripts to just execute "mmc dev", and
> not have to also execute "mmc rescan" to check for media presense.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
> common/cmd_mmc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/cmd_mmc.c b/common/cmd_mmc.c
> index 6c8db2e78c4f..1e40983c757b 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_mmc.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_mmc.c
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static int do_mmc_dev(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 		return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> 	}
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, true);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.1.5
> 

Behavioral change that no one could possibly depend on, so I'll just go ahead and get it in.

Thanks, applied.

-- Pantelis

Acked-by: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] cmd_mmc: make mmc dev always re-probe the HW

[Stephen Warren]

On 06/12/2014 05:31 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> On May 23, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Currently, U-Boot behaves as follows:
>>
>> - Begin with no SD card inserted in "mmc 1"
>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>> - This fails, since there is no card
>> - User plugs in an SD card
>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>> - This still fails, since the HW isn't reprobed.
>>
>> With this change, U-Boot behaves as follows:
>>
>> - Begin with no SD card inserted in "mmc 1"
>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>> - This fails, since there is no card
>> - User plugs in an SD card
>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>> - The newly present SD card is detected
...
> Thanks, applied.
> 
> -- Pantelis
> 
> Acked-by: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>

Thanks very much for applying these.

I'm puzzled why you write Acked-by in the emails, and add it to the
commit descriptions when you apply them? FWIW for reference: Acked-by as
used by the Linux kernel is usually only used when giving permission to
a different maintainer to apply the patches, rather than taking them
through the usual tree. Signed-off-by is the tag usually used when
applying commits yourself, although there's an unresolved question re:
whether adding s-o-b (or presumably anything at all) to commits when
applying them is appropriate behaviour for U-Boot.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] cmd_mmc: make mmc dev always re-probe the HW

[Pantelis Antoniou]

Hi Stephen,

On Jun 12, 2014, at 7:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

> On 06/12/2014 05:31 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> On May 23, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> Currently, U-Boot behaves as follows:
>>> 
>>> - Begin with no SD card inserted in "mmc 1"
>>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>>> - This fails, since there is no card
>>> - User plugs in an SD card
>>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>>> - This still fails, since the HW isn't reprobed.
>>> 
>>> With this change, U-Boot behaves as follows:
>>> 
>>> - Begin with no SD card inserted in "mmc 1"
>>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>>> - This fails, since there is no card
>>> - User plugs in an SD card
>>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>>> - The newly present SD card is detected
> ...
>> Thanks, applied.
>> 
>> -- Pantelis
>> 
>> Acked-by: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>
> 
> Thanks very much for applying these.
> 
> I'm puzzled why you write Acked-by in the emails, and add it to the
> commit descriptions when you apply them? FWIW for reference: Acked-by as
> used by the Linux kernel is usually only used when giving permission to
> a different maintainer to apply the patches, rather than taking them
> through the usual tree. Signed-off-by is the tag usually used when
> applying commits yourself, although there's an unresolved question re:
> whether adding s-o-b (or presumably anything at all) to commits when
> applying them is appropriate behaviour for U-Boot.

Patchwork adds the Acked-by: line in the patches, and when I apply the
patch I know for sure that I have actually reviewed the patch, and didn't
just apply it blindly.

Just a way to not let things slip in.

Regards

-- Pantelis

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] cmd_mmc: add force_init parameter to init_mmc_device()

[Stephen Warren]

On 05/23/2014 01:24 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> 
> This allows callers to inject mmc->has_init = 0 between finding the
> MMC device, and calling mmc_init(), which forces mmc_init() to rescan
> the HW. Future changes will use this feature.

Pantelis, does this series look good?

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] cmd_mmc: add force_init parameter to init_mmc_device()

[Jaehoon Chung]

Hi, Stephen.

Your patch-set looks good to me.

Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>

If card didn't insert, can we display the other log instead of the below log?

#mmc rescan
#mmc dev 1
"Card did not respond to voltage select!"

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

On 05/31/2014 06:12 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 01:24 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>
>> This allows callers to inject mmc->has_init = 0 between finding the
>> MMC device, and calling mmc_init(), which forces mmc_init() to rescan
>> the HW. Future changes will use this feature.
> 
> Pantelis, does this series look good?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
> 

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] cmd_mmc: add force_init parameter to init_mmc_device()

[Stephen Warren]

On 06/01/2014 10:59 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi, Stephen.
> 
> Your patch-set looks good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> 
> If card didn't insert, can we display the other log instead of the below log?
> 
> #mmc rescan
> #mmc dev 1
> "Card did not respond to voltage select!"

Some SD slots have a "card detect" GPIO or similar, so it might be
possible to do that. Of course, not all slots have that, and I don't
know how to differentiate "card not present" from "command timed out".
Is there a defined way to do that?

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] cmd_mmc: add force_init parameter to init_mmc_device()

[Stephen Warren]

On 05/30/2014 03:12 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 01:24 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>
>> This allows callers to inject mmc->has_init = 0 between finding the
>> MMC device, and calling mmc_init(), which forces mmc_init() to rescan
>> the HW. Future changes will use this feature.
> 
> Pantelis, does this series look good?

Any comments?

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] cmd_mmc: add force_init parameter to init_mmc_device()

[Pantelis Antoniou]

Hi Stephen,

On May 23, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> 
> This allows callers to inject mmc->has_init = 0 between finding the
> MMC device, and calling mmc_init(), which forces mmc_init() to rescan
> the HW. Future changes will use this feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
> 
> common/cmd_mmc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/cmd_mmc.c b/common/cmd_mmc.c
> index 9e6a26fe62a2..6741ebee3bca 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_mmc.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_mmc.c
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void print_mmcinfo(struct mmc *mmc)
> 
> 	printf("Bus Width: %d-bit\n", mmc->bus_width);
> }
> -static struct mmc *init_mmc_device(int dev)
> +static struct mmc *init_mmc_device(int dev, bool force_init)
> {
> 	struct mmc *mmc;
> 	mmc = find_mmc_device(dev);
> @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ static struct mmc *init_mmc_device(int dev)
> 		printf("no mmc device at slot %x\n", dev);
> 		return NULL;
> 	}
> +	if (force_init)
> +		mmc->has_init = 0;
> 	if (mmc_init(mmc))
> 		return NULL;
> 	return mmc;
> @@ -117,7 +119,7 @@ static int do_mmcinfo(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> @@ -247,7 +249,7 @@ static int do_mmcrpmb(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 	if (flag == CMD_FLAG_REPEAT && !cp->repeatable)
> 		return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> @@ -292,7 +294,7 @@ static int do_mmc_read(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 	blk = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
> 	cnt = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 16);
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> @@ -320,7 +322,7 @@ static int do_mmc_write(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 	blk = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
> 	cnt = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 16);
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> @@ -348,7 +350,7 @@ static int do_mmc_erase(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 	blk = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 16);
> 	cnt = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> @@ -387,7 +389,7 @@ static int do_mmc_part(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 	block_dev_desc_t *mmc_dev;
> 	struct mmc *mmc;
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(curr_device, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> @@ -422,7 +424,7 @@ static int do_mmc_dev(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 		return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> 	}
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> @@ -462,7 +464,7 @@ static int do_mmc_bootbus(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 	reset = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 10);
> 	mode = simple_strtoul(argv[4], NULL, 10);
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> @@ -487,7 +489,7 @@ static int do_mmc_boot_resize(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 	bootsize = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 10);
> 	rpmbsize = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 10);
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> @@ -520,7 +522,7 @@ static int do_mmc_partconf(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 	part_num = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 10);
> 	access = simple_strtoul(argv[4], NULL, 10);
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> @@ -555,7 +557,7 @@ static int do_mmc_rst_func(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
> 		return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> 	}
> 
> -	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev);
> +	mmc = init_mmc_device(dev, false);
> 	if (!mmc)
> 		return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.1.5
> 

Looks fine. I have a slight preference for not using bools in C code, but I see it's already creeping in the codebase.
I'll apply it as is, and if we have any complaints by people using really ancient compilers I'll convert to int.

Thanks, applied.

-- Pantelis

Acked-by: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>