From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] usb: ci_udc: allow multiple buffer allocs per ep
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:55:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5399CD7C.7020409@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <539966A7.7050503@posteo.de>
On 06/12/2014 02:36 AM, J?rg Krause wrote:
>
> On 06/10/2014 09:34 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/02/2014 05:02 PM, J?rg Krause wrote:
>>> Sorry, my previous post was not shown correctly. The raw text was missing. I
>>> removed the annotation.
>>>
>>> Since this commit my Ethernet Gadget on a custom Freescale i.MX28 board is
>>> broken. Using tftp to download files I get in almost all cases a timeout:
...
>> The only other thing I can think of is that there's some issue with the
>> bounce buffer alignment or size being wrong somehow. Perhaps try
>> increasing those?
>
> I checked this and I found that ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is set to 64, which is
> not true for Freescale i.MX28. This processor has an ARM926EJ-S, which
> has an cache line size of 32.
This should be fine. The only effect of setting ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to a
value that's larger than it needs to be is: a tiny amount of RAM will be
wasted, since structures are allocated aligned to a larger boundary/size
than is strictly necessary in HW, and since SW should always round the
size of an area to be flushed up to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN too, then perhaps
a few more cache lines are flushed than is strictly necessary.
> In arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h the macro ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is defined
> as followed:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE
> #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE
> #else
> #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN 64
> #endif
>
> And in /arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/cache.c as followed:
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE
> #define CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE 32
> #endif
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h does not see the definition of
> CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE in /arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/cache.c, so it's a
> bad place to put it in there.
Ah yes. That ifdef should certainly be in some global header that is
always included before/from arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h.
Without the correct CACHELINE_SIZE definition, the cache flushing
routines are probably flushing entirely the address or amount of memory.
> I defined CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE to 32 in my config header file and
Yes, that seems like the best fix.
FWIW, for Tegra we have a per-SoC header that defines SoC-specific
constants, so that each board file doesn't need to duplicate them.
> it works under the following circumstances: I have to disable the macro
> CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DUALSPEED. But, and this is strange, it works only the
> first time of a tftp download after a reset of the board. If I try to
> use tftp a second time, I get the same timeout error as before.
That's very odd. I can't explain why this wouldn't fix the issue
completely, unless there's *also* some other bug.
...
> Lastly, I changed CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE to 16 and this works for me
> in normal mode an in dual speed mode.
That's quite odd, and doesn't make much sense at all. You're sure the
cache line size really isn't 16?
...
>> I'm slightly confused by this log. Do you have 2 boards running U-Boot,
>> one running the USB controller in device mode, and this is the log from
>> some other board that's talking to that first board?
>
> I have one board connect to a PC. The log shows two different errors
> happening on the board. The first log shows a tftp command on the board
> stopping with a timeout after receiving some packets. The second log
> shows a tftp command on the same board throwing an error before
> receiving any packet.
So U-Boot is running on the board, and the logs are from the board, i.e.
you're running the "tftp" command in U-Boot on the board?
If so, I'm confused how ci_udc comes into play at all; doesn't "tftp"
use the USB controller in host mode, whereas ci_udc is only used for
device mode?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-12 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 23:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] usb: ci_udc: allow multiple buffer allocs per ep Stephen Warren
2014-05-05 23:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] usb: ums: remove ci_udc special case Stephen Warren
2014-05-07 21:31 ` Marek Vasut
2014-05-07 21:31 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] usb: ci_udc: allow multiple buffer allocs per ep Marek Vasut
2014-06-02 22:57 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-02 23:02 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-10 19:34 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-12 8:36 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-12 12:59 ` Marek Vasut
2014-06-12 15:55 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2014-06-12 17:30 ` Marek Vasut
2014-06-12 17:42 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-16 1:00 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5399CD7C.7020409@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox