From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:19:08 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] cmd_mmc: make mmc dev always re-probe the
	HW
In-Reply-To: <15F70FA9-6890-4480-9838-9CB9F03B062A@antoniou-consulting.com>
References: <1400873087-20921-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
	<1400873087-20921-3-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
	<15F70FA9-6890-4480-9838-9CB9F03B062A@antoniou-consulting.com>
Message-ID: <5399D2FC.3080700@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 06/12/2014 05:31 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> On May 23, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Currently, U-Boot behaves as follows:
>>
>> - Begin with no SD card inserted in "mmc 1"
>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>> - This fails, since there is no card
>> - User plugs in an SD card
>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>> - This still fails, since the HW isn't reprobed.
>>
>> With this change, U-Boot behaves as follows:
>>
>> - Begin with no SD card inserted in "mmc 1"
>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>> - This fails, since there is no card
>> - User plugs in an SD card
>> - Execute: mmc dev 1
>> - The newly present SD card is detected
...
> Thanks, applied.
> 
> -- Pantelis
> 
> Acked-by: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>

Thanks very much for applying these.

I'm puzzled why you write Acked-by in the emails, and add it to the
commit descriptions when you apply them? FWIW for reference: Acked-by as
used by the Linux kernel is usually only used when giving permission to
a different maintainer to apply the patches, rather than taking them
through the usual tree. Signed-off-by is the tag usually used when
applying commits yourself, although there's an unresolved question re:
whether adding s-o-b (or presumably anything at all) to commits when
applying them is appropriate behaviour for U-Boot.