From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Markus Niebel <list-09@tqsc.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:52:35 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [Patch v2 0/7] Add support for TQMa6 modules
In-Reply-To: <53A081D5.5030003@denx.de>
References: <1402937486-13397-1-git-send-email-list-09_u-boot@tqsc.de>
	<53A064FC.8030905@denx.de> <53A07DA5.10502@tqsc.de>
	<53A081D5.5030003@denx.de>
Message-ID: <53A7F8E3.7030006@tqsc.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hello Stefano,

Am 17.06.2014 19:58, schrieb Stefano Babic:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On 17/06/2014 19:40, Markus Niebel wrote:
>
>>> Is it not an attractive alternative for you ? Instead of having several
>>> entries in boards.cfg for each variation of your board, you could have
>>> maybe only one or a couple.
>
>> Sure it is - main difference will be boot devices.
>
> Right - I am expecting then an entry in boards.cfg for each media, that
> is able to run on all SOCs.
>

Do you mean, accepting the board needs the switch to SPL / single image 
support? Or will the current solution - one entry for TQMa6 with MX6Q/D 
and one for TQMa6 with i.MX6S - be accepted?

>> The env on different boot media
>> in one image is AFAIK not possible - so at the moment four configs are needed:
>> SP vs MMC and i.MX6Q/D vs i.MX6S (But this is slightly OT)
>
> Well, SP vs MMC is right. But having an entry for all SOCs without
> having to select one of it at compile time, it is really a plus ;-)
>
> Best regards,
> Stefano Babic
>
>
Best Regards

Markus