From: "Jörg Krause" <jkrause@posteo.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: ci_udc: fix interaction with CONFIG_USB_ETH_CDC
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 01:16:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ADFB5C.1040108@posteo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53ADE847.8080104@wwwdotorg.org>
On 06/27/2014 11:55 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/27/2014 03:37 PM, J?rg Krause wrote:
>> I added the last series of patches beginning from 2014-06-10 for testing
>> purposes. The patches from 2014-05-29 were already applied.
>>
>> First series of patches:
>>
>> Applying: usb: ci_udc: call udc_disconnect() from ci_pullup()
>> Applying: usb: ci_udc: fix freeing of ep0 req
>> Applying: usb: ci_udc: fix probe error cleanup
>> Applying: usb: ci_udc: clean up all allocations in unregister
>>
>> Calling tftp the first time after a reset runs fine,
> I thought the issue you reported was that the *first* time you run the
> "tftp" command, it has issues such as timeouts? Did I misunderstand, or
> did that issue somehow go away?
That's right! This was the state before applying a series of patches
after allow multiple buffer allocs per ep. Now, the first run of tftp
runs without any errors.
> [snip]
> Yes, that is certainly expected to solve issues with *multiple*
> invocations of "tftp" or similar commands and ethernet over ci_udc. The
> first hunk in that patch fixes something I probably introduced during
> one of my ci_udc patches (probably the one that you originally replied
> to "usb: ci_udc: allow multiple buffer allocs per ep"), but the second
> hunk fixes a problem that I /think/ has always been there. Did multiple
> invocations of "tftp" using ci_udc as the network device ever work for
> you before, without random crashes or memory leaks?
Yes, it did. If I can remember right it stopped working after a series
of patches from 2014-04-24. But I am not sure.
>> But there is still a problem:
>> I have to wait some seconds before I can run a second time tftp. This is
>> the output from U-Boot:
>>
>> => run update_rootfs
>> Updating rootfs ...
>> using ci_udc, OUT ep- IN ep- STATUS ep-
>> high speed config #1: 2 mA, Ethernet Gadget, using CDC Ethernet
>> USB network up!
>> Using usb_ether device
>> [snip]
>>
>> => run update_rootfs
>> Updating rootfs ...
>> using ci_udc, OUT ep- IN ep- STATUS ep-
>> high speed config #1: 2 mA, Ethernet Gadget, using CDC Ethernet
>> ERROR: The remote end did not respond in time.
>> at drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c:2388/usb_eth_init()
>>
>> Wait some seconds ...
>>
>> => run update_rootfs
>> Updating rootfs ...
>> using ci_udc, OUT ep- IN ep- STATUS ep-
>> high speed config #1: 2 mA, Ethernet Gadget, using CDC Ethernet
>> USB network up!
>> Using usb_ether device
>> [snip]
> Hmm. That's odd. I didn't notice that, but I'll try retesting sometime.
> What exactly does $update_rootfs contain? It might be useful to know
> some details of your network topology (e.g. is the TFTP server on the
> machine that the USB cable is plugged into or further away, and are the
> machine and network lightly loaded) and rough sizes of the files you're
> downloading.
This is what update_rootfs is doing:
"update_rootfs=echo Updating rootfs ...; " \
"if tftp ${rootfs_file}; then " \
"mtdparts default; " \
"nand erase.part rootfs; " \
"ubi part rootfs; " \
"ubi create rootfs; " \
"ubi write ${loadaddr} rootfs ${filesize}; " \
"fi; " \
"\0" \
Filesize of rootfs.ubifs is about 13 MB.
The tftp server (tftp-hpa 5.2-4) is running on my notebook (running Arch
Linux), where the device is plugged via USB cable. Ethernet is not used,
but wireless network, which is used "normal" I would say.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-27 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-23 18:02 [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: ci_udc: fix interaction with CONFIG_USB_ETH_CDC Stephen Warren
2014-06-23 19:03 ` Eric Nelson
2014-06-25 13:51 ` Marek Vasut
2014-06-25 16:06 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-27 21:37 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-27 21:52 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-27 21:56 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-27 23:27 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-27 21:55 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-27 23:16 ` Jörg Krause [this message]
2014-06-27 23:37 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-28 0:09 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-28 1:34 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-28 20:37 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-28 20:45 ` Marek Vasut
2014-06-28 20:53 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-29 20:33 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-30 9:37 ` Marek Vasut
2014-06-30 13:34 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-30 16:02 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-30 19:55 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-30 22:44 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-30 22:51 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-30 23:17 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-30 23:56 ` Marek Vasut
2014-06-30 20:55 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-30 21:15 ` Marek Vasut
2014-06-30 21:43 ` Jörg Krause
2014-06-30 21:50 ` Marek Vasut
2014-06-25 20:20 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53ADFB5C.1040108@posteo.de \
--to=jkrause@posteo.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox