From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeroen Hofstee Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 20:25:17 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/4] MAINTAINERS: add initial version In-Reply-To: References: <1406400886-20941-1-git-send-email-daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com> <1406400886-20941-2-git-send-email-daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com> <53D4040C.1060502@myspectrum.nl> Message-ID: <53D5440D.2020004@myspectrum.nl> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Daniel, On 26-07-14 22:50, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: > Hi Jeroen, > > 2014-07-26 21:39 GMT+02:00 Jeroen Hofstee : >> Hello Daniel, >> >> >> On 26-07-14 20:54, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: >>> MAINTAINERS contains all currently known custodians based on >>> infos from wiki [1] and u-boot git forks [2]. >>> >>> [1] http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Custodians >>> [2] http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=forks >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck >>> --- >>> >>> MAINTAINERS | 338 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 338 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 MAINTAINERS >>> >> huh, has this not already been refused several times in the past? >> > according to [1] we want to have one top-level MAINTAINERS for the > custodians and multiple MAINTAINERS files per board (will be added > with the Kconfig patch series) > > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/185242/focus=185899 > Ah my bad, I interpreted this as yet another way to track maintainers. But it seems you are at least aware the KConfig patchset also carry such patches, so it likely is fine. Sorry for the noise. Regards, Jeroen