From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeroen Hofstee <dasuboot@myspectrum.nl>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 23:15:00 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 4/5] usb/gadget: fastboot: add sparse image
 definitions
In-Reply-To: <20140807211004.650DC3804B4@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1407369313-13815-1-git-send-email-srae@broadcom.com>
	<1407369313-13815-5-git-send-email-srae@broadcom.com>
	<20140807053446.B8F90380CBC@gemini.denx.de>
	<201408071509.43619.marex@denx.de> <53E37F2D.5090700@linutronix.de>
	<20140807205927.3C4103804B4@gemini.denx.de>
	<53E3E974.1020504@myspectrum.nl>
	<20140807211004.650DC3804B4@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <53E3EC54.4090002@myspectrum.nl>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de


On 07-08-14 23:10, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jeroen,
>
> In message <53E3E974.1020504@myspectrum.nl> you wrote:
>> On 07-08-14 22:59, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> So the argument about incompatible licenses is valid here. Should
>>>> u-boot switch to GPLv3 you need to hunt down that file again and this
>>> You would have to rewrite the major part of U-Boot or to cripple it
>> noise ^ not
>>> to uselessness if you try to release it under GPLv3. I cannot see
>>> anybody investing any efforts in that direction; all these threads
>>> about a potential GPLv3 switch are just a hollow scarecrow.
> sorry, can't parse that.

no, this was nicely formatted in my mail editor. Just wanted to point out
you forgot a "not". You mentioned "to cripple it" you more then like ment
"to _not_ cripple it". But the whitespace got lost along the way.

Regards,
Jeroen