From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeroen Hofstee Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 23:19:09 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 4/5] usb/gadget: fastboot: add sparse image definitions In-Reply-To: <53E3EC54.4090002@myspectrum.nl> References: <1407369313-13815-1-git-send-email-srae@broadcom.com> <1407369313-13815-5-git-send-email-srae@broadcom.com> <20140807053446.B8F90380CBC@gemini.denx.de> <201408071509.43619.marex@denx.de> <53E37F2D.5090700@linutronix.de> <20140807205927.3C4103804B4@gemini.denx.de> <53E3E974.1020504@myspectrum.nl> <20140807211004.650DC3804B4@gemini.denx.de> <53E3EC54.4090002@myspectrum.nl> Message-ID: <53E3ED4D.8080001@myspectrum.nl> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 07-08-14 23:15, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: > > On 07-08-14 23:10, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Jeroen, >> >> In message <53E3E974.1020504@myspectrum.nl> you wrote: >>> On 07-08-14 22:59, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>>> >>>>> So the argument about incompatible licenses is valid here. Should >>>>> u-boot switch to GPLv3 you need to hunt down that file again and this >>>> You would have to rewrite the major part of U-Boot or to cripple it >>> noise ^ not >>>> to uselessness if you try to release it under GPLv3. I cannot see >>>> anybody investing any efforts in that direction; all these threads >>>> about a potential GPLv3 switch are just a hollow scarecrow. >> sorry, can't parse that. > > no, this was nicely formatted in my mail editor. Just wanted to point out > you forgot a "not". You mentioned "to cripple it" you more then like ment > "to _not_ cripple it". But the whitespace got lost along the way. ah, and the noise: part is that most readers would have figured that out without me mentioning it. Regards, Jeroen