[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] net: fec_mxc: Adjust RX DMA alignment for mx6solox

Stefan Roese
2014-08-21T06:03:46Z

Hi Fabio,

On 20.08.2014 23:24, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
>
> mx6solox has a requirement for 64 bytes alignment for RX DMA transfer.
>
> Adjust it accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Avoid too many ifdef's by providing a dma_rx_align() funtion as suggested
> by Otavio
>
> drivers/net/fec_mxc.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c b/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c
> index 4cefda4..1a5105e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> */
> #define FEC_XFER_TIMEOUT 5000
>
> +#define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN_MX6SX 64
> +
> #ifndef CONFIG_MII
> #error "CONFIG_MII has to be defined!"
> #endif
> @@ -267,6 +269,15 @@ static int fec_tx_task_disable(struct fec_priv *fec)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int dma_rx_align(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MX6SX
> + return ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN_MX6SX;
> +#else
> + return ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN;
> +#endif

Why don't you just use the bigger value (64) for all SoC versions?
Shouldn't hurt, right. And would keep the source clean.

Thanks,
Stefan