From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:58:26 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] kconfig: move CONFIG_OF_* to Kconfig
In-Reply-To: <CAMhH57TTcEUNTh7ve-gjX5+btxoYjQp5SV+2Uc6xzoOerzEbXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1410079409-28450-1-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>	<1410079409-28450-10-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>	<540DC579.5060307@wwwdotorg.org>
	<CAMhH57TTcEUNTh7ve-gjX5+btxoYjQp5SV+2Uc6xzoOerzEbXg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <540DD222.1070607@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 09/08/2014 09:57 AM, Masahiro YAMADA wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
>
>
> 2014-09-09 0:04 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>:
>
>> I don't believe this is the correct approach; CONFIG_OF_CONTROL isn't a
>> user-configurable option, and hence shouldn't show up in *_defconfig.
>> "select OF_CONTROL" in a Kconfig file probably makes sense though.
>
>
> I think it depends on the board (SoC).
>
> In my understanding,  Zynq boards should work with/without Device Tree control.
> (Moreover, Zynq boards work with/without  SPL)
>
> At least as for Zynq,
> CONFIG_OF_CONTROL  ( and CONFIG_SPL too) is a user-configurable option.
>
> (Michal, please correct me if I am wrong.)
>
>
> I am not familiar with Tegra SoCs, but
> do Tegra boards always Device Tree? ( and only work with SPL ?)
>
> If so,
>
> config TEGRA
>          select SPL
>          select OF_CONTROL
>
> looks better?

That looks correct for Tegra.