* [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/t104xrdb: make T104x board compliant in u-boot
@ 2014-09-22 6:02 Vijay Rai
2014-10-14 18:34 ` York Sun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vijay Rai @ 2014-09-22 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
When booted with upstream code, it shows error in u-boot that board is not
compliant. This patch will make board compliant with upstream code changes
in u-boot.
Signed-off-by: Vijay Rai <vijay.rai@freescale.com>
---
include/configs/T1040QDS.h | 2 ++
include/configs/T104xRDB.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/T1040QDS.h b/include/configs/T1040QDS.h
index ebee89a..602cc94 100644
--- a/include/configs/T1040QDS.h
+++ b/include/configs/T1040QDS.h
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
*/
#define CONFIG_T1040QDS
#define CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
+#define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD
+#define CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO
#ifdef CONFIG_RAMBOOT_PBL
#define CONFIG_RAMBOOT_TEXT_BASE CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
diff --git a/include/configs/T104xRDB.h b/include/configs/T104xRDB.h
index c4bf0d6..341dad9 100644
--- a/include/configs/T104xRDB.h
+++ b/include/configs/T104xRDB.h
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
*/
#define CONFIG_T104xRDB
#define CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
+#define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD
+#define CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO
#ifdef CONFIG_RAMBOOT_PBL
#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_PBL_PBI $(SRCTREE)/board/freescale/t104xrdb/t104x_pbi.cfg
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/t104xrdb: make T104x board compliant in u-boot
2014-09-22 6:02 [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/t104xrdb: make T104x board compliant in u-boot Vijay Rai
@ 2014-10-14 18:34 ` York Sun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: York Sun @ 2014-10-14 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 09/21/2014 11:02 PM, Vijay Rai wrote:
> When booted with upstream code, it shows error in u-boot that board is not
> compliant. This patch will make board compliant with upstream code changes
> in u-boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Rai <vijay.rai@freescale.com>
> ---
I think the commit message is not accurate. You are not making it compliant, but
rather using generic board. No need to say "upstream" here. This is the upstream
u-boot.
Have you tested features such as deep sleep using generic board code?
York
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-14 18:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-22 6:02 [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/t104xrdb: make T104x board compliant in u-boot Vijay Rai
2014-10-14 18:34 ` York Sun
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox