From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:35:13 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "sunxi: dram: Use divisor P=1 for PLL5" In-Reply-To: <1413965658.20604.44.camel@hellion.org.uk> References: <1413367931-4224-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20141015133420.75921bd7@i7> <543F8662.9060805@redhat.com> <20141021205842.GC25506@bill-the-cat> <1413965658.20604.44.camel@hellion.org.uk> Message-ID: <54476C41.4020900@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi, On 10/22/2014 10:14 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 16:58 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: >> We should be doing things right, in mainline. To bring up a different >> example, on TI OMAP4 parts at least for a long time in order to use >> mainline U-Boot on older kernels you had to manually add >> CONFIG_SOMETHING_OR_ANOTHER to enable additional clocks/mux that the old >> kernels had incorrectly relied on U-Boot to set. If we must do strange >> things to support old and incorrect but in the wild kernels we need to >> (a) make it opt-in (easier now with Kconfig!) and (b) schedule a removal >> of the hack all the same. > > A Kconfig option does sound like a reasonable compromise. Ok, I will look into this, my plan for now is to call it OLD_KERNEL_COMPAT, so that if we come across more cases like this we've one config option for them, rather then a ton of small isolated config options. Regards, Hans