[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: bootm: Allow booting in secure mode on hyp capable systems

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi Ian,

On 10/22/2014 08:55 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 15:45 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> 	if (!fake) {
>>  #if defined(CONFIG_ARMV7_NONSEC) || defined(CONFIG_ARMV7_VIRT)
>> -		armv7_init_nonsec();
>> -		secure_ram_addr(_do_nonsec_entry)(kernel_entry,
>> -						  0, machid, r2);
>> -#else
>> -		kernel_entry(0, machid, r2);
>> +		if (boot_nonsec()) {
>> +			armv7_init_nonsec();
>> +			secure_ram_addr(_do_nonsec_entry)(kernel_entry,
>> +							  0, machid, r2);
>> +		}
>>  #endif
>> +		kernel_entry(0, machid, r2);
> 
> There's a subtle different here, which is that this final kernel_entry
> call used to be in the #else clause, and so emitted for the NONSEC ||
> VIRT case. So if the _do_nonsec_entry call were to fail (not currently
> possible) and return you'd end up trying again via the sec path.
> 
> I'm not sure that's a bad thing, but it is a difference so it'd be good
> to know it was a deliberate choice (or not).

I was under the assumption that do_nonsec_entry would never fail, and would
not return, which is why I wrote this code the way I wrote it. I'm not sure
if retrying in secure mode meets the principle of least surprise, so I guess
the #if .. #endif block should probably get an "else" added before the #endif,
do you agree?

Regards,

Hans