[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/10] Provide inttypes.h to avoid 32/64 bit problems with printf()

[Jeroen Hofstee <jeroen@myspectrum.nl>]

Hi Simon, attempt two..

On 24-10-14 03:03, Simon Glass wrote:
> +Jeroen
>
> Hi,
>
> On 15 October 2014 04:38, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>> In quite a few situations we have to print a 64-bit value. Unfortunately
>> the type used for 64-bit can vary depending on the machine. For 64-bit
>> machines it might be 'long' and for 32-bit machines it might be
>> 'long long'.
>>
>> As a result we need to use either %ld or %lld depending on the architecture.
>> Add the inttypes.h header file to provide defines for this and clean up the
>> code to use these defines in a few places.
>>
>> The stdint.h file is bundled with recent versions of gcc and it is generally
>> better to use this rather than our own versions. Add an option to use the
>> internal stdint.h file.
>>
>>
>> Gabe Black (2):
>>    Provide option to avoid defining a custom version of uintptr_t.
>>    Add some standard headers external code might need
>>
>> Simon Glass (8):
>>    ext4: Use inttypes for printf() string
>>    Use uint64_t for time types
>>    Use uint64_t instead of u64 in put_dec()
>>    Tidy up data sizes and function comment in display_options
>>    x86: Use correct printf() format string for uintptr_t
>>    scsi: Use correct printf() format string for uintptr_t
>>    usb: Use correct printf() format string for uintptr_t
>>    test: Add a simple test to detected warnings with uint64_t, uintptr_t
> Are there any comments on this series? I'm keen to clean up the
> printf() types a bit. Also this simplifies building withe external
> libraries, and with more work might reduce the difference between
> U-Boot code in /tools and the rest of it.

No comments from my side. clang seem to digest this fine.

Regards,
Jeroen