From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Schocher Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:52:59 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] nand: reinstate lazy bad block scanning In-Reply-To: <1415050949.23458.268.camel@snotra.buserror.net> References: <1413978044-31766-1-git-send-email-lisovy@merica.cz> <1415050949.23458.268.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Message-ID: <545A2BBB.10905@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hello Scott, Rostislav, Am 03.11.2014 22:42, schrieb Scott Wood: > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 13:40 +0200, Rostislav Lisovy wrote: >> Commit ff94bc40af3481d47546595ba73c136de6af6929 >> ("mtd, ubi, ubifs: resync with Linux-3.14") >> accidentally reverted part of the commit >> 13f0fd94e3cae6f8a0d9fba5d367e311edc8ebde >> ("NAND: Scan bad blocks lazily."). >> >> Reinstate the change as by commit >> fb49454b1b6c7c6e238ac3c0b1e302e73eb1a1ea >> ("nand: reinstate lazy bad block scanning") >> >> Signed-off-by: Rostislav Lisovy >> --- >> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 10 +++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Thanks for catching this. Yep! I tested it on the siemens am335x boards so Acked-by: Heiko Schocher > Heiko, this is the sort of thing I was concerned about with the "resync > from scratch" approach. I know, but the rebase was also error prone (at least in my attempts ...) As we have now a clear defined base, maybe a resync with the help from git works now in future? bye, Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany