From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:51:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5460B4B5.2060602@siemens.com> (raw)
Hi Marc,
what is the motivation to expose a PSCI 0.1 interface in U-boot, instead
of 0.2? Support for preexisting users of 0.1? The kernel seems to be
happy with both, and I'm now wondering if we should actually add the
legacy version to Jailhouse as well (I hope we can avoid this).
Still studying the logic: Is it possible to provide both interfaces, and
would it make sense?
Jan
next reply other threads:[~2014-11-10 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-10 12:51 Jan Kiszka [this message]
2014-11-10 13:08 ` [U-Boot] ARM: PSCI 0.1 vs 0.2 Marc Zyngier
2014-11-10 13:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-11-10 13:29 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-11-10 13:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-11-10 13:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-11-28 8:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-11-28 10:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-11-28 10:24 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5460B4B5.2060602@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox