From: B.R. Oake <broake@openmailbox.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Cannot compile arm u-boot with hardfloat toolchain
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 15:30:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AAAE29.7040801@openmailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150105133729.GF10826@bill-the-cat>
On 05/01/15 13:37, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 12:24:13PM +0000, B.R. Oake wrote:
>> I still wonder though whether a nicer way would be for the configs to be
>> refactored so that -msoft-float was not set on platforms where it wasn't
>> appropriate.
>
> We've gone over this before (so there's discussions in the archive) but
> in sum, no, we don't want to get into doing floating point.
Hi Tom,
OK, I'll look for those discussions for more background. Just in case
there's any misunderstanding, though, I wasn't advocating using floating
point, I just meant that U-Boot code might want to perform operations
such as long long integer division, which will invoke a libgcc function
such as __udivdi3(), and for the linking to succeed we need to ensure
that U-Boot and libgcc are using the same ABI. On a fully hard-float
system, removing the -msoft-float compilation option seems a good way of
achieving that.
Thanks,
B.R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-05 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-04 22:23 [U-Boot] Cannot compile arm u-boot with hardfloat toolchain Michal Suchanek
2015-01-05 1:28 ` Tom Rini
2015-01-05 9:46 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-01-05 10:46 ` B.R. Oake
2015-01-05 10:51 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-05 12:08 ` Michael Trimarchi
2015-01-05 12:24 ` B.R. Oake
2015-01-05 13:37 ` Tom Rini
2015-01-05 15:30 ` B.R. Oake [this message]
2015-01-05 14:58 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AAAE29.7040801@openmailbox.org \
--to=broake@openmailbox.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox