From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:23:55 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Fix repeated USB scans problems In-Reply-To: <201501081806.17115.marex@denx.de> References: <1420550862-10704-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <54AE412F.2030004@redhat.com> <54AEAD75.9090601@wwwdotorg.org> <201501081806.17115.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <54AEBD2B.1070203@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi, On 08-01-15 18:06, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Thursday, January 08, 2015 at 05:16:53 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 01/08/2015 01:34 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi, > > Hi! > >>> On 08-01-15 01:19, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> On 01/07/2015 04:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 at 06:02:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> Should we rename "usb reset" to "usb restart"? >>>>> >>>>> No, let's not mess with the UI any more than we already did. >>>> >>>> Well, it might not be such a bad idea if the semantics are changing, >>>> to give people a heads-up? >>> >>> Only the semantics of "usb start" are changing, and you are suggesting >>> renaming "usb reset" which remains unchanged ... >> >> Yes, that's true. So I suppose we should indeed not rename anything. > > OK, let's go with this approach now. So we are all in agreement, good, so through who's tree are these 2 patches going to go upstream ? Note I can take them upstream through the sunxi tree, but the usb tree seems better to me ... Regards, Hans