From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBCaWXDn21hbm4=?= <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:48:21 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tools/kwbimage.c: fix parser error handling
In-Reply-To: <546525C7.5000500@myspectrum.nl>
References: <1414185952-2227-1-git-send-email-andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
	<544E3548.4040405@myspectrum.nl> <546525C7.5000500@myspectrum.nl>
Message-ID: <54B27F25.2030401@googlemail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

ping?

It is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/403237/

On 13.11.14 22:42, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
> 
> On 27-10-14 13:06, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>> Hello Andreas,
>>
>> On 24-10-14 23:25, andreas.devel at googlemail.com wrote:
>>> From: Andreas Bie?mann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
>>>
>>> The two error checks for image_boot_mode_id and
>>> image_nand_ecc_mode_id where
>>> wrong and would never fail, fix that!
>>>
>>> This was detected by Apple's clang compiler:
>>> ---8<---
>>>    HOSTCC  tools/kwbimage.o
>>> tools/kwbimage.c:553:20: warning: comparison of unsigned expression <
>>> 0 is always false [-Wtautological-compare]
>>>                  if (el->bootfrom < 0) {
>>>                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~
>>> tools/kwbimage.c:571:23: warning: comparison of unsigned expression <
>>> 0 is always false [-Wtautological-compare]
>>>                  if (el->nandeccmode < 0) {
>>>                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~
>>> 2 warnings generated.
>>> --->8---
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Bie?mann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>   tools/kwbimage.c | 14 ++++++++------
>>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/kwbimage.c b/tools/kwbimage.c
>>> index 42870ed..8fd70ef 100644
>>> --- a/tools/kwbimage.c
>>> +++ b/tools/kwbimage.c
>>> @@ -548,13 +548,14 @@ static int
>>> image_create_config_parse_oneline(char *line,
>>>           el->version = atoi(value);
>>>       } else if (!strcmp(keyword, "BOOT_FROM")) {
>>>           char *value = strtok_r(NULL, deliminiters, &saveptr);
>>> -        el->type = IMAGE_CFG_BOOT_FROM;
>>> -        el->bootfrom = image_boot_mode_id(value);
>>> -        if (el->bootfrom < 0) {
>>> +        int ret = image_boot_mode_id(value);
>>> +        if (ret < 0) {
>>>               fprintf(stderr,
>>>                   "Invalid boot media '%s'\n", value);
>>>               return -1;
>>>           }
>>> +        el->type = IMAGE_CFG_BOOT_FROM;
>>> +        el->bootfrom = ret;
>>>       } else if (!strcmp(keyword, "NAND_BLKSZ")) {
>>>           char *value = strtok_r(NULL, deliminiters, &saveptr);
>>>           el->type = IMAGE_CFG_NAND_BLKSZ;
>>> @@ -566,13 +567,14 @@ static int
>>> image_create_config_parse_oneline(char *line,
>>>               strtoul(value, NULL, 16);
>>>       } else if (!strcmp(keyword, "NAND_ECC_MODE")) {
>>>           char *value = strtok_r(NULL, deliminiters, &saveptr);
>>> -        el->type = IMAGE_CFG_NAND_ECC_MODE;
>>> -        el->nandeccmode = image_nand_ecc_mode_id(value);
>>> -        if (el->nandeccmode < 0) {
>>> +        int ret = image_nand_ecc_mode_id(value);
>>
>> Thanks for fixing this. Could you move the int ret declaration before
>> actual code though?
> 
> Ah, I see now, you were not adding the declaration in the middle of
> the code. There is just a newline missing after the declaration,
> which make the patch look like it does. This was already the
> case in the original code, so
> 
> Acked-By: Jeroen Hofstee <jeroen@myspectrum.nl>
> 
> Regards,
> Jeroen