[U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_sf: Fix problem with "sf update" and unaligned length

[Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>]

Hi Stefan,

On 01/12/2015 08:56 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Gerlando,
>
> On 12.01.2015 08:51, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
>> thanks for the patch.
>> Please compare it with my v1 revision of the patch:
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/150468/
>> Back then, Simon suggested to use two separate SPI flash operations to
>> avoid the memcpy() operation.
>
> This again could generate unaligned accesses which my patch version does
> not do.

That's right -- I was just trying to say that my v1 was actually doing 
the same thing as yours, and to explain why I changed it at a later 
point (which seemed legitimate back then). Since my new revision 
introduced unaligned accesses, we're now essentially reverting to the 
original one. That's all.

Thank you!
Gerlando

>
>> I guess noone would have guessed about
>> QSPI devices at the time.
>>
>> Anyway, your patch looks even better than my v1 then, so:
>>
>> Acked-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
>