[U-Boot] [PATCH 01/11] Exynos542x: Config: Add various configs

[Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>]

On 15/01/15 22:33, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
> This patch adds "iRAM, CPU state and low power" configs
> which are the addresses acting as flag registers.
> 
> iROM code checks CONFIG_LOWPOWER_FLAG address. If it is equal
> to CONFIG_LOWPOWER_EN then it jumps to the address (0x02020000+CPUID*4).
> This is a part of iROM logic. Rest other flags are being used at
> various places during kernel switching and reset.
> They are nowhere documented because they are part programming.
> These configs are serving as flags for us because they are
> representing the addresses in iRAM which we are using for
> storing and extracting CPU Status and GIC status.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
> ---
>  include/configs/exynos5-common.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/configs/exynos5-common.h b/include/configs/exynos5-common.h
> index ad63f3c..831bfd3 100644
> --- a/include/configs/exynos5-common.h
> +++ b/include/configs/exynos5-common.h
> @@ -231,4 +231,32 @@
>  	MEM_LAYOUT_ENV_SETTINGS \
>  	BOOTENV
>  
> +/* iRAM */
> +#define CONFIG_PHY_IRAM_BASE		0x02020000
> +#define CONFIG_SEC_IRAM_SIZE		0x53000	/* 332KB */
> +
> +#define CONFIG_EXYNOS_RELOCATE_CODE_BASE	(CONFIG_PHY_IRAM_BASE	\
> +					+ CONFIG_SEC_IRAM_SIZE)
> +
> +/*
> + * Low Power settings
> + */
> +#define CONFIG_LOWPOWER_FLAG		0x02020028
> +#define CONFIG_LOWPOWER_ADDR		0x0202002C
> +#define CONFIG_LOWPOWER_EN		0xc9cfcfcf
> +
> +/*
> + * CPU State Settings
> + */
> +#define CONFIG_CPU_STATE		(CONFIG_EXYNOS_RELOCATE_CODE_BASE + 0x28)
> +#define CONFIG_GIC_STATE		(CONFIG_EXYNOS_RELOCATE_CODE_BASE + 0x38)
> +
> +#define CONFIG_CPU0_STATE		(CONFIG_CPU_STATE + 0x0)
> +#define CONFIG_CPU1_STATE		(CONFIG_CPU_STATE + 0x4)
> +#define CONFIG_CPU2_STATE		(CONFIG_CPU_STATE + 0x8)
> +#define CONFIG_CPU3_STATE		(CONFIG_CPU_STATE + 0xC)
> +
> +#define RESET				(1 << 0)
> +#define SECONDARY_RESET			(1 << 1)
> +

These two defines looks very common.
Please modify the name.

Thanks,
Minkyu Kang.