public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Exynos5: Fix warnings and enrich clock_get_periph_rate
@ 2015-01-16  5:48 Akshay Saraswat
  2015-01-16  5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/6] Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Akshay Saraswat @ 2015-01-16  5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

This patch series does following changes -
1. Removing compiler warnings for clock_get_periph_rate.
2. Adding and enabling support for Exynos542x in
   clock_get_periph_rate.
3. Replacing peripheral specific function calls with
   clock_get_periph_rate.
4. Remove code from clocks file which became useless due to
   introduction of clock_get_periph_rate.

Changes since v2:
	- Patch-1: Added debug message for unknown periph IDs.
	- Patch-2: Changed exynos5420 -> exynos542x in comment.
	- Patch-3: Fixed enum and soc_get_periph_rate switch.
	- Patch-3: Added checks for negative values in soc_get_periph_rate.
	- Patch-4: Added checks for negative values in soc_get_periph_rate.

Changes since v1:
	- Added 2 new patches.

Akshay Saraswat (6):
  Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate
  Exynos542x: Move exynos5420_get_pll_clk up and rename
  Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
  Exynos5: Fix exynos5_get_periph_rate calculations
  Exynos5: Use clock_get_periph_rate generic API
  Exynos5: Remove dead code for fetching clocks

 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c      | 584 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h |   3 +
 2 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 308 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
@ 2015-02-02  4:27 Akshay Saraswat
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Akshay Saraswat @ 2015-02-02  4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hi,

>Hi, All.
>
>On 01/28/2015 02:55 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>> 
>> On 01/28/2015 02:15 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Joonyoung,
>>>
>>> On 27 January 2015 at 22:12, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> On 01/28/2015 02:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>> Hi Joonyoung,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27 January 2015 at 21:46, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/28/2015 01:09 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 15 January 2015 at 23:09, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 01/16/2015 02:48 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
>>>>>>>>> We planned to fetch peripheral rate through one generic API per
>>>>>>>>> peripheral. These generic peripheral functions are in turn
>>>>>>>>> expected to fetch apt values from a function refactored as
>>>>>>>>> per SoC versions. This patch adds support for fetching peripheral
>>>>>>>>> rates for Exynos5420 and Exynos5800.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>>>>>>       - Fixed enum and exynos542x_get_periph_rate switch.
>>>>>>>>>       - Added checks for negative values in exynos542x_get_periph_rate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>>>>>>       - Changes suuport -> support in commit message.
>>>>>>>>>       - Removed position change of exynos5420_get_pll_clk.
>>>>>>>>>       - Removed #ifdef.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c      | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h |   3 +
>>>>>>>>>  2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What else needs to be done to get this applied, please?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As i said, current this patch has some problem like mask bits, so eMMC
>>>>>> doesn't work normally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>>>>> index 5dc9ed2..ee6c13b 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct clk_bit_info {
>>>>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  /* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
>>>>>>>>> -static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos5_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>>>>       {PERIPH_ID_UART0,       0,      0,      -1},
>>>>>>>>>       {PERIPH_ID_UART1,       4,      4,      -1},
>>>>>>>>>       {PERIPH_ID_UART2,       8,      8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> @@ -61,6 +61,42 @@ static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>>>>       {PERIPH_ID_NONE,        -1,     -1,     -1},
>>>>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos542x_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_UART0,       4,      8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_UART1,       8,      12,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_UART2,       12,     16,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_UART3,       16,     20,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C0,        -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C1,        -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C2,        -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C3,        -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C4,        -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C5,        -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C6,        -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C7,        -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_SPI0,        20,     20,     8},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_SPI1,        24,     24,     16},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_SPI2,        28,     28,     24},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0,      0,      0,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1,      4,      10,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2,      8,      20,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C8,        -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C9,        -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2S0,        0,      0,      4},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2S1,        4,      12,     16},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_SPI3,        12,     16,     0},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_SPI4,        16,     20,     8},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4,      16,     0,      8},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_PWM0,        24,     28,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_PWM1,        24,     28,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_PWM2,        24,     28,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_PWM3,        24,     28,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_PWM4,        24,     28,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_I2C10,       -1,     8,      -1},
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +     {PERIPH_ID_NONE,        -1,     -1,     -1},
>>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>  /* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
>>>>>>>>>  static struct set_epll_con_val exynos5_epll_div[] = {
>>>>>>>>>       { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
>>>>>>>>> @@ -306,16 +342,22 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
>>>>>>>>>  static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
>>>>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>>>>       int i;
>>>>>>>>> +     struct clk_bit_info *info;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -     for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>>>>>>> -             if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>>>>>>> +     if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
>>>>>>>>> +             info = exynos542x_bit_info;
>>>>>>>>> +     else
>>>>>>>>> +             info = exynos5_bit_info;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +     for (i = 0; info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>>>>>>> +             if (info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>>>>>>>                       break;
>>>>>>>>>       }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -     if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>>>>>>> +     if (info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>>>>>>>               debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -     return &clk_bit_info[i];
>>>>>>>>> +     return &info[i];
>>>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>>>>> @@ -414,12 +456,107 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>>>>>       return sub_clk;
>>>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>> +     struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
>>>>>>>>> +     unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
>>>>>>>>> +     unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
>>>>>>>>> +     struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
>>>>>>>>> +                     (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +     switch (peripheral) {
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_UART0:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_UART1:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_UART2:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_UART3:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_PWM0:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_PWM1:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_PWM2:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_PWM3:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_PWM4:
>>>>>>>>> +             src = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
>>>>>>>>> +             div = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
>>>>>>>>> +             break;
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_SPI0:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_SPI1:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_SPI2:
>>>>>>>>> +             src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);
>>>>>>>>> +             div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
>>>>>>>>> +             sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric4);
>>>>>>>>> +             break;
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_SPI3:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_SPI4:
>>>>>>>>> +             src = readl(&clk->src_isp);
>>>>>>>>> +             div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>>>>>>> +             sub_div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>>>>>>> +             break;
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
>>>>>>>>> +             src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
>>>>>>>>> +             div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
>>>>>>>>> +             break;
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C2:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C3:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C4:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C5:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C6:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C8:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C9:
>>>>>>>>> +     case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
>>>>>>>>> +             sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>>>>>>> +             sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
>>>>>>>>> +                                                             & 0x7) + 1;
>>>>>>>>> +             return sclk / sub_div;
>>>>>>>>> +     default:
>>>>>>>>> +             debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral);
>>>>>>>>> +             return -1;
>>>>>>>>> +     };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +     if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
>>>>>>>>> +             src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +     switch (src) {
>>>>>>>>> +     case EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL:
>>>>>>>>> +             sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>>>>>>> +             break;
>>>>>>>>> +     case EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL:
>>>>>>>>> +             sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(EPLL);
>>>>>>>>> +             break;
>>>>>>>>> +     case EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL:
>>>>>>>>> +             sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL);
>>>>>>>>> +             break;
>>>>>>>>> +     default:
>>>>>>>>> +             return 0;
>>>>>>>>> +     }
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Odroid xu3 board uses SPLL as source clock for SDMMCx, please SPLL case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps this can be sorted out by the maintainer of that board? I'm
>>>>>>> not sure how we can deal with this other than a special case.
>>>>>>> Certainly Akshay is not going to know what to do here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think this is special case, SPLL also can be used as source
>>>>>> clock like MPLL, EPLL and RPLL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +     /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
>>>>>>>>> +     if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
>>>>>>>>> +             div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmm, mask bits are different each peripheral, e.g. SDMMCx needs 0x3ff
>>>>>>>> mask bits.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Akshay, could you follow up this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please issue a Reviewed-by/Tested-by for those patches you are
>>>>> happy with?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure, i will reply Reviewed-by or Tested-by if he solves issues.
>>>
>>> OK, so are any of the patches OK now? Basically I'm not sure if you
>>> have more comments. It looks like 3-4 of them are OK, but I'm not
>>> sure.
>>>
>> 
>> They are ok to me except 3, 5, 6 patches because if 3 patch isn't fixed
>> 5,6 patches are meaningless.
>
>Is Akshay working these? As Simon is mentioned, i want to know the plan..
>If Akshay is busy, i will rework these with patches based on Akshay.
>

Apologies for the delay.
I was on vacation and couldn't access mails outside office.
Will respin this set by EoD.

>Best Regards,
>Jaehoon Chung
>
>> 
>> Thanks.
>>

Regards,
Akshay Saraswat

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-02  4:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-16  5:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Exynos5: Fix warnings and enrich clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-16  5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/6] Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28  4:06   ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16  5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/6] Exynos542x: Move exynos5420_get_pll_clk up and rename Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28  4:06   ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16  5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-16  6:09   ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-28  4:09     ` Simon Glass
2015-01-28  4:46       ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-28  5:01         ` Simon Glass
2015-01-28  5:12           ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-28  5:15             ` Simon Glass
2015-01-28  5:55               ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-30  2:22                 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-01-16  5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/6] Exynos5: Fix exynos5_get_periph_rate calculations Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28  4:09   ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16  5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/6] Exynos5: Use clock_get_periph_rate generic API Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28  4:09   ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16  5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/6] Exynos5: Remove dead code for fetching clocks Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28  4:09   ` Simon Glass
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-02  4:27 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support Akshay Saraswat

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox