From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] net: phy: Add ability to program the ksz9031 skew values from the uboot env
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:26:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54DB121E.8070800@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANr=Z=YxN4kKccdAyQfNDkZknKs_4wNYQ5PO+heJKAgmOPYhBA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11.02.2015 09:07, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>>>> I agree it would make more sense to pull these from devicetree - I'm
>>>> planning on adding that in a future patch. I thought it would be a good
>>>> idea to pull these values from the environment first, overriding the
>>>> devicetree (if present in the environment). This approach is helpful
>>>> during bringup & debug since it doesn't require one to change the
>>>> devicetree to try something quickly. I'm ok with any approach you think
>>>> would work for the community.
>>>
>>>
>>> You can do that with the 'mii' command as well I think, but I might be
> wrong.
>>
>>
>> Yes. For testing or board bringup this might really serve. Even though
> this setting via environment as proposed from Vince is more elegant and
> less hackish. And easier to adjust/tune for "normal users".
>>
>> The default values should come from the DT, once this is all in place.
> But I think that for initial board bringup / testing such a method, to
> override those values via environment variables can be quite helpful.
>>
>> Joe, whats your opinion on this?
>
> Do we really think this is a strong use-case? This seem like the type of
> thing I would expect to tweak for testing through mii / mdio commands and
> then configure the device tree based on that. This is pretty much a
> one-time thing for a given board it seems to me.
>
> If we really want a polished interface to it, we should define a
> sub-command / new command that phy drivers can implement. I'm not sure an
> undiscoverable, un-"help"-able list of env vars will be apparent to users.
> Do you have a feeling for how close to universal any of these parameters
> are across phys?
No. But with your comments above (which make total sense), I tend to NAK
this ability to configure the PHY skew timings via environment variables.
Thanks,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-11 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-09 14:44 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Add getenv_long and Micrel ksz9031 skew settings Vince Bridgers
2015-02-09 14:44 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] cmd: Add getenv_long to support reading signed integers from the uboot env Vince Bridgers
2015-02-09 19:12 ` Marek Vasut
2015-02-09 14:44 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] net: phy: Add ability to program the ksz9031 skew values " Vince Bridgers
2015-02-09 19:18 ` Marek Vasut
2015-02-09 21:31 ` Vince Bridgers
2015-02-10 18:51 ` Marek Vasut
2015-02-11 7:08 ` Stefan Roese
2015-02-11 8:07 ` Joe Hershberger
2015-02-11 8:26 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2015-02-13 16:19 ` Vince Bridgers
2015-02-13 16:44 ` Stefan Roese
2015-02-15 14:43 ` Marek Vasut
2015-02-13 16:17 ` Vince Bridgers
2015-02-13 16:05 ` Vince Bridgers
2015-02-13 15:57 ` Vince Bridgers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54DB121E.8070800@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox