From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:38:48 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] u-boot sunxi fel plan for v2015.04 In-Reply-To: <20150215164304.185dc30e@i7> References: <54DDB37C.9010906@redhat.com> <20150213215049.GJ7086@bill-the-cat> <20150215164304.185dc30e@i7> Message-ID: <54E0CB98.4080501@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi, On 15-02-15 15:43, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:50:49 -0500 > Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:19:08AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi Siarhei and Simon, >>> >>> I'm wondering what the plan is wrt sunxi FEL booting for u-boot >>> v2015.04 I know that you both have been working on this, and I >>> think that for v2015.04 Simon's latest set probably is the best >>> way forward for now, we're going to need parts of that set >>> anyways for the more complete solution Siarhei has. >>> >>> we could replace the patch adding all the #ifdef's to start.S >>> with code saving / restoring PCR15 and friends, that would be >>> more cleaner. >>> >>> So I see 2 ways forwards for v2014.05 >>> >>> 1) Go with Simon's latest set as is. >>> 2) Take the first patches from Simon's set and replace the >>> on adding he #ifdef's to start.S with one saving / restoring >>> the necessary regs >>> >>> I've a slight preference for 2. Siarhei, can you perhaps prepare >>> a patch-set for 2 for merging for v2014.05 ? >> >> And when everyone is happy I'll take it via the sunxi tree (And try and >> see about giving it a spin on my Lime2). Thanks! > > Thanks for clarifying this. > > Simon, could you please confirm that you are not going to do anything > anymore with the third patch from your sunxi FEL fixes set? > > Hans, could you please queue Simon's patches in the sunxi next branch > just like Tom suggested (and after the status of the third patch becomes > more clear)? I'm fine with taking Simon's patch-set as is, and upstreaming it through the sunxi tree, but the start.S changes are not really sunxi specific, so I think they need Alberts ack? Tom are you ok with taking these without Albert's ack? And/or Albert can we have your ack for: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437580/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437581/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437582/ (the 2nd one is not really ARM specific, but still) Regards, Hans