From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dinh Nguyen Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:00:45 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCHv1 01/22] arm: socfpga: spl: Add main sdram code In-Reply-To: <201502231757.02771.marex@denx.de> References: <1421253662-27222-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@opensource.altera.com> <54EB5740.10005@opensource.altera.com> <54EB57D9.6040203@opensource.altera.com> <201502231757.02771.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <54EB5CBD.2020203@opensource.altera.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 2/23/15 10:57 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Monday, February 23, 2015 at 05:39:53 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: >> On 2/23/15 10:37 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: >>> On 2/15/15 5:25 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>>> +#if ENABLE_BRINGUP_DEBUGGING >>>> >>>> Could we get rid of this for initial merge? >>> >>> Yeah, it can be removed. >>> >>>>> +static inline void reg_file_set_sub_stage(uint32_t set_sub_stage) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + /* Read the current group and stage */ >>>>> + uint32_t cur_stage_group = IORD_32DIRECT(REG_FILE_CUR_STAGE, 0); >>>> >>>> Could normal u-boot memory access macros be used here? >>> >>> I'll look.. >> >> Actually, I'm reworking this whole IORD_* that uses the AVL_TO_APB to a >> function. This was already commented by Marek. > > If this can be switched to regular readl()/writel() stuff, then please do > so, since that'd be much less confusing. > Yes, that is what I've done. Dinh