From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:46:47 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 4/4] ARM: DRA7: fastboot: Implement reboot-bootloader command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <54F5F387.8060409@ti.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 03/03/2015 11:31 AM, Dileep Katta wrote: > On 3 March 2015 at 19:45, Rob Herring wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Dileep Katta >> wrote: [...] >>> diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c >>> index 48199bf..00791be 100644 >>> --- a/common/cmd_bootm.c >>> +++ b/common/cmd_bootm.c >>> @@ -729,6 +729,11 @@ int do_booti(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, >> char * const argv[]) >>> { >>> int ret; >>> >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_FASTBOOT) >>> + if (!fb_check_reboot_flag()) >>> + do_fastboot(cmdtp, flag, argc, argv); >>> +#endif >> >> Part of the booti command? First, booti is for arm64 Image files. How >> does this work for you? > > This was ported from an existing DRA7 implementation as per latest u-boot. Ummm... I am curious and wonder why the authorship changed if it was just a "port"? Might be nice to point to original source where this was picked up from http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=repo/u-boot.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/p-ti-u-boot-2014.07 For example patch #2 http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=repo/u-boot.git;a=commit;h=5df0356d4c34611d32f905dea51e9c908075eec1 I cant see much of a change here to have an authorship change perhaps? Do I understand that Angela is ok with the same? please confirm. > Should have sent it > as RFC patch, as this is not verified due to unavailability of board. Hmm... interesting.... maybe Vish can help here? [...] -- Regards, Nishanth Menon