public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6: Set shared override bit in PL310 AUX_CTRL register
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:17:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55019FF5.2010601@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426104732-26695-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com>

On 03/11/2015 03:12 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> 
> Having bit 22 cleared in the PL310 Auxiliary Control register (shared
> attribute override enable) has the side effect of transforming Normal
> Shared Non-cacheable reads into Cacheable no-allocate reads.
> 
> Coherent DMA buffers in Linux always have a Cacheable alias via the
> kernel linear mapping and the processor can speculatively load cache
> lines into the PL310 controller. With bit 22 cleared, Non-cacheable
> reads would unexpectedly hit such cache lines leading to buffer
> corruption.
> 
> This was inspired by a patch from Catalin Marinas [1] and also from recent 
> discussions in the linux-arm-kernel list [2] where Russell King and Rob Herring 
> suggested that bootloaders should initialize the cache. 
> 
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-November/031810.html
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/20/199
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c | 8 ++++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/pl310.h | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c
> index ef02972..5aab305 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c
> @@ -506,6 +506,14 @@ void v7_outer_cache_enable(void)
>  	struct pl310_regs *const pl310 = (struct pl310_regs *)L2_PL310_BASE;
>  	unsigned int val;
>  
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Set bit 22 in the auxiliary control register. If this bit
> +	 * is cleared, PL310 treats Normal Shared Non-cacheable
> +	 * accesses as Cacheable no-allocate.
> +	 */
> +	setbits_le32(&pl310->pl310_aux_ctrl, L310_SHARED_ATT_OVERRIDE_ENABLE);
> +
>  #if defined CONFIG_MX6SL
>  	struct iomuxc *iomux = (struct iomuxc *)IOMUXC_BASE_ADDR;
>  	val = readl(&iomux->gpr[11]);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pl310.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pl310.h
> index ddc245b..de7650e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pl310.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pl310.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
>  #define L2X0_STNDBY_MODE_EN			(1 << 0)
>  #define L2X0_CTRL_EN				1
>  
> +#define L310_SHARED_ATT_OVERRIDE_ENABLE		(1 << 22)
> +
>  struct pl310_regs {
>  	u32 pl310_cache_id;
>  	u32 pl310_cache_type;
> 

is it possible for us to centralize the pl310 logic - that'd let us
reuse generic logic cross SoCs without having to duplicate bits like
these over and over. at least A9 based TI SoCs could potentially
benefit out of this.

The only problem was to deal with actual PL310 configuration path
which could be SoC dependent, but then, we could implement weak
functions that allow us to override the same. I tried to do something
like that for CP15 errata[1]

just my 2 cents.

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/214436
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-12 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-11 20:12 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6: Set shared override bit in PL310 AUX_CTRL register Fabio Estevam
2015-03-12  1:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-12  2:27   ` Fabio Estevam
2015-03-12  9:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-12  9:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-12 13:41 ` Tom Rini
2015-03-12 13:57   ` Fabio Estevam
2015-03-12 14:25     ` Fabio Estevam
2015-03-12 14:43       ` Nishanth Menon
2015-03-12 15:15         ` Fabio Estevam
2015-03-12 15:34           ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-10  0:35             ` Fabio Estevam
2015-04-10  5:45               ` Nishanth Menon
2015-03-12 14:17 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2015-05-15 13:35 ` Stefano Babic
2015-05-15 13:37   ` Fabio Estevam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55019FF5.2010601@ti.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox