From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: York Sun Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:02:40 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 17/28] armv8/fsl-lsch3: Enable system error aborts In-Reply-To: <1426795104.27998.143.camel@freescale.com> References: <1426783559-26610-1-git-send-email-yorksun@freescale.com> <1426783559-26610-17-git-send-email-yorksun@freescale.com> <20150319181433.GH10153@leverpostej> <1426794750.27998.139.camel@freescale.com> <550B2993.9060206@freescale.com> <1426795104.27998.143.camel@freescale.com> Message-ID: <550B2B60.4010404@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 03/19/2015 12:58 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 12:54 -0700, York Sun wrote: >> >> On 03/19/2015 12:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 18:14 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:45:48PM +0000, York Sun wrote: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood >>> >>> York, where's your signoff since you're the one submitting the patch? >> >> I am sending many patches in this set. Since I didn't contribute to this patch, >> I didn't add my signed-off-by. > > That's not what signed-off-by means. I realize (though never understood > why) the U-Boot project differs from Linux rules in terms of whether > custodians are expected to sign off patches when applying, but does that > extend to submitting patches by e-mail as well? > I don't have the answer myself. I haven't added any of my signed-off-by for the patches I squashed/tested/sent. For small patch set, I would request the original author to send each patch. For large set with dependency, I send patch on behalf of the authors. I don't want to take credit for the patch I didn't contribute the change. I test all of them though. If the signed-off-by has different meanings, I am OK to change my practice. York