From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:17:00 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] config: Use booti instead of bootz on 64-bit
 ARM
In-Reply-To: <1426852577-19474-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
References: <1426852577-19474-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <550C47FC.8000908@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 03/20/2015 05:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> The bootz command doesn't work with Linux kernel images on 64-bit ARM.
> The replacement command with the same interface and functionality is
> booti.

Uggh. Why can't bootz work everywhere, or why can't bootz be an alias to 
booti on ARM64? Are the command-line parameters different? It'd be 
really nice to be able to create one boot.scr.uimg file that just works 
everywhere, and having different command names will scupper that.