[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 20/28] armv8/ls2085ardb: Add support of LS2085ARDB platform

[York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>]

On 03/23/2015 03:02 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 18:46 -0700, York Sun wrote:
>>
>> On 03/20/2015 05:33 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 17:29 -0700, York Sun wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> index f4a7851..7478eb4 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -658,6 +658,16 @@ config TARGET_LS2085AQDS
>>>>  	  development platform that supports the QorIQ LS2085A
>>>>  	  Layerscape Architecture processor.
>>>>  
>>>> +config TARGET_LS2085ARDB
>>>> +	bool "Support ls2085ardb"
>>>> +	select ARM64
>>>> +	select ARMV8_MULTIENTRY
>>>> +	help
>>>> +	  Support for Freescale LS2085ARDB platform.
>>>> +	  The LS2080A Reference design board (RDB) is a high-performance
>>>> +	  development platform that supports the QorIQ LS2085A
>>>> +	  LayerScape Architecture processor.
>>>> +
>>>
>>> s/LayerScape/Layerscape/
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/board/freescale/ls2085aqds/README b/board/freescale/ls2085ardb/README
>>>> similarity index 73%
>>>> copy from board/freescale/ls2085aqds/README
>>>> copy to board/freescale/ls2085ardb/README
>>>> index a4d7b53..cfd5185 100644
>>>> --- a/board/freescale/ls2085aqds/README
>>>> +++ b/board/freescale/ls2085ardb/README
>>>> @@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
>>>>  Overview
>>>>  --------
>>>> -The LS2080A Development System (QDS) is a high-performance computing,
>>>> -evaluation, and development platform that supports the QorIQ LS2080A
>>>> -LayerScape Architecture processor. The LS2080AQDS provides validation and
>>>> -SW development platform for the Freescale LS2080A processor series, with
>>>> -a complete debugging environment.
>>>> +The LS2085A Reference Design (RDB) is a high-performance computing,
>>>> +evaluation, and development platform that supports the QorIQ LS2085A
>>>> +Layerscape Architecture processor.
>>>
>>> "LayerScape" and 2080 should be fixed in the QDS patch as well.
>>>
>>>> @@ -113,25 +105,25 @@ unsigned long get_board_ddr_clk(void);
>>>>  #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_CSOR    (CSOR_NAND_ECC_ENC_EN   /* ECC on encode */ \
>>>>  				| CSOR_NAND_ECC_DEC_EN  /* ECC on decode */ \
>>>>  				| CSOR_NAND_ECC_MODE_4  /* 4-bit ECC */ \
>>>> -				| CSOR_NAND_RAL_3	/* RAL = 2Byes */ \
>>>> -				| CSOR_NAND_PGS_2K	/* Page Size = 2K */ \
>>>> -				| CSOR_NAND_SPRZ_64/* Spare size = 64 */ \
>>>> -				| CSOR_NAND_PB(64))	/*Pages Per Block = 64*/
>>>> +				| CSOR_NAND_RAL_3	/* RAL = 3Byes */ \
>>>> +				| CSOR_NAND_PGS_4K	/* Page Size = 4K */ \
>>>> +				| CSOR_NAND_SPRZ_224	/* Spare size = 224 */ \
>>>> +				| CSOR_NAND_PB(128))	/*Pages Per Block = 128*/
>>>
>>> From this it looks like the QDS patch still has a comment/code
>>> inconsistency with RAL.
>>>
>>
>> Let me re-generate the patch using patman, without -C --find-copies-harder flag
>> so they don't show as copy-n-modify.
> 
> Why?  I found it rather useful.  In any case, the error in the QDS file
> will still be there.
> 

I have to modify patman to have these flags. Personally I prefer to use them.
But I guess if everyone uses the patman, so should I.

York