[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mpc85xx gpio related header files changes to compile common cmd_gpio.c

[Oleksandr G Zhadan <oleks@arcturusnetworks.com>]

Yes, here locally we have some additional changes/fixes in some places 
as well. And if talk about mpc85xx gpio support it's better to have 
driver in drivers/gpio vs static definitions in header file and I have 
it. But currently I need this minimal patch to be accepted to send our 
board support patch based on this one.

Oleks

On 03/27/2015 11:46 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 10:51 -0400, Oleksandr G Zhadan wrote:
>> Extra gpio bank argument at low level may be discussable, but IMPO we
>> should not brake standard int gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
>> definition.
>>
>> And the reason of this patch is to fix:
>>
>> 1. Incompatibility in functions gpio_free() and gpio_set_value()
>> definitions between <asm/gpio.h> and <asm-generic/gpio.h> (void vs int)
>>
>> 2. Compilation error when build common/cmd_gpio.c for mpc85xx (p1020)
>
> Sure, when I saw "mpc85xx gpio .." I remembered seeing this flaw so I figured
> I point it out before I forget again.
>
> This also makes me remember, drivers/spi/fsl_espi.c is broken for anything
> but reading an EEPROM.
>
>    Jocke
>