From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] kbuild: move ARCH, CPU, etc. to top Makefile to fix random build error
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:33:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551C724E.602@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427803341-28286-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
On 03/31/2015 06:02 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Since the Kconfig conversion, some developers have reported that
> Kbuild sometimes fails completely at random. According to the error
> reports, it seems to occur for any target board, but only on very
> fast computers.
>
> The log message for the fail case is like this:
>
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../arch//cpu/u-boot.lds',
> needed by `u-boot.lds'. Stop.
>
> It looks like the top config.mk has not been included for *some*
> reason, and $(ARCH) has been left blank.
>
> I suspect "autoconf_is_current" is not working in some situation.
That's certainly true. The following code doesn't end up including
config.mk in the bad case:
> # We want to include arch/$(ARCH)/config.mk only when include/config/auto.conf
> # is up-to-date. When we switch to a different board configuration, old CONFIG
> # macros are still remaining in include/config/auto.conf. Without the following
> # gimmick, wrong config.mk would be included leading nasty warnings/errors.
> autoconf_is_current := $(if $(wildcard $(KCONFIG_CONFIG)),$(shell find . \
> -path ./include/config/auto.conf -newer $(KCONFIG_CONFIG)))
> ifneq ($(autoconf_is_current),)
> include $(srctree)/config.mk
> include $(srctree)/arch/$(ARCH)/Makefile
> endif
That's because:
> [swarren at swarren-lx1 tegra-uboot-flasher]$ ls -l --full-time u-boot-*/{.config,include/config/auto.conf}|cat
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 swarren swarren 9219 2015-04-01 15:50:08.000000000 -0600 u-boot-bad/.config
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 swarren swarren 928 2015-04-01 15:50:08.000000000 -0600 u-boot-bad/include/config/auto.conf
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 swarren swarren 9219 2015-04-01 15:51:25.000000000 -0600 u-boot-ok/.config
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 swarren swarren 928 2015-04-01 15:51:26.000000000 -0600 u-boot-ok/include/config/auto.conf
In the bad case, the timestamps are equal (and hence the -newer check
fails), whereas in the good case they're different. Recall ext*
filesystems have a 1s timestamp resolution.
Note that this is state left over from "make xxx_defconfig"; If I just
manually run "make all" in a tree in this state, it'll stay in this
state forever, and vice-versa for a working tree.
I expect that simulating this condition with some judicious manually
executed touch commands would be extremely easy.
Possible solutions are:
Is there a -newer-or-equal that could be used in the find command rather
than -newer?
When running "make xxx_defconfig", can the code there compare the
timestamp of those two files, and keep looping and touching the
auto.conf file until the timestamps differ.
Something else entirely? I couldn't see anything relating to
autoconf_is_current in the kernel's makefiles.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-01 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-31 12:02 [U-Boot] [PATCH] kbuild: move ARCH, CPU, etc. to top Makefile to fix random build error Masahiro Yamada
2015-03-31 15:37 ` York Sun
2015-03-31 15:45 ` Stephen Warren
2015-03-31 15:57 ` York Sun
2015-04-01 22:33 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2015-04-03 3:54 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551C724E.602@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox