public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails or is invalid
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 23:41:02 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5524BF6E.5090308@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5524B779.5090308@wwwdotorg.org>

On 04/07/2015 11:07 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/04/2015 07:12 AM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
>> This may happen when using an USB1 device on a controller that only supports
>> USB2 (e.g. EHCI). Reading the first descriptor will fail (read 0 byte), so we
>> can abort the process at this point instead of failing later and wasting time.
> 
> FYI, this patch breaks USB keyboard (or perhaps any USB 1.x device)
> support on the RPi.
> 
>> diff --git a/common/usb.c b/common/usb.c
> 
>> @@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ int usb_new_device(struct usb_device *dev)
>>  	 */
>>  #ifndef CONFIG_USB_XHCI
>>  	err = usb_get_descriptor(dev, USB_DT_DEVICE, 0, desc, 64);
>> -	if (err < 0) {
>> +	if (err < sizeof(struct usb_device_descriptor)) {
>>  		debug("usb_new_device: usb_get_descriptor() failed\n");
>>  		return -EIO;
>>  	}
> 
> The value returned here is 8 not 18 (the sizeof the descriptor), so the
> code bails out with an error.
> 
> Given the description of what this patch is attempting to achieve,
> shouldn't the replacement check be:
> 
> 	if (err <= 0) {
> 
> My guess for why the value 8 is returned is because the device's
> maxpacket is 8, and the DWC2 driver only attempts to transfer 1 packet
> because the requested transfer size is 64, and the default packet size
> is 64, which means 1 packet. Note that DWC2 HW (perhaps unlike e.g.
> EHCI) requires the driver to specify the number of packets transferred,
> not a byte count. However, I haven't validated that yet. My device is a
> USB 1.x FS keyboard.

Yes, I can avoid the error by hacking dwc2.c's assignment of max:

> int chunk_msg(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned long pipe, int *pid, int in,
> 	      void *buffer, int len, bool ignore_ack)
> {
...
> 	int max = usb_maxpacket(dev, pipe);

and forcing that to 8 rather than 64 for the data transfer phase of the
first transaction to each USB device (my keyboard has a built-in hub, so
I need to override a few different transactions).

Thinking about the fix more, perhaps something like the following is
appropriate:

if (err < offsetof(struct usb_device_descriptor, idVendor))

... since idVendor is the first field that's not used by the code that
processes the results of the initial descriptor read. Hopefully there
are no devices with a control endpoint bMaxPacketSize0 less than 8
(which is what that offsetof evaluates to).
http://www.usbmadesimple.co.uk/ums_3.htm seems to imply that's the case,
saying for control transfers:

The max packet size for the data stage is 8 bytes at low speed, 8, 16,
32 or 64@full Speed and 64 for high speed.

(although one of my keyboards has a maxPacket of 4 for EP 2, but I
thinkt hat's something different)

Also note the comment a little before the code this patch affects in
U-Boot's common/usb.c:

> 	/* send 64-byte GET-DEVICE-DESCRIPTOR request.  Since the descriptor is
> 	 * only 18 bytes long, this will terminate with a short packet.  But if
> 	 * the maxpacket size is 8 or 16 the device may be waiting to transmit
> 	 * some more, or keeps on retransmitting the 8 byte header. */

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-08  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-04 13:12 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/3] usb: usb_new_device return codes consistency Paul Kocialkowski
2015-04-04 13:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/3] usb: Check usb_new_device for failure Paul Kocialkowski
2015-04-04 13:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] usb: Early failure when the first descriptor read fails or is invalid Paul Kocialkowski
2015-04-08  5:07   ` Stephen Warren
2015-04-08  5:41     ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2015-04-08 20:59       ` Paul Kocialkowski
2015-04-06 15:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/3] usb: usb_new_device return codes consistency Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5524BF6E.5090308@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox